BALT vs JANP

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF against PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
19 bp
JANP is cheaper
1-year return gap
6.5 pts
JANP is ahead
Larger fund
BALT
$3.2B

Side by side

BALTJANP
FundInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January
IssuerInnovatorPGIM
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.69%0.50%
Assets$3.2B$47M
Average daily dollar volume$23M$456K
ListedJun 30, 2021Dec 29, 2023
FrenzyCap score6238
1-month return+0.3%+0.6%
3-month return+2.4%+3.9%
Year to date+4.7%+10.2%
1-year return+6.7%+13.2%
30-day volatility3.1%4.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.1%−5.3%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings69
Top 10 weight102.2%102.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$317M thru Jul 2026+$3.9M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility15.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BALT holdings · JANP holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.