BATT vs SMOG

Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF against VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
5 bp
BATT is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.8 pts
BATT is ahead
Larger fund
SMOG
$131M

Side by side

BATTSMOG
FundAmplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETFVanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
IssuerAmplifyVanEck
CategoryEVs & BatteriesClean Energy & Climate
Expense ratio0.59%0.64%
Assets$112M$131M
Average daily dollar volume$534K$139K
ListedJun 4, 2018May 3, 2007
FrenzyCap score4032
1-month return−3.0%−1.1%
3-month return+2.7%−1.7%
Year to date+6.4%+5.3%
1-year return+9.4%+4.6%
30-day volatility23.1%19.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−23.0%−16.9%
Trailing 12-month yield1.74%1.49%
Holdings5358
Top 10 weight47.1%57.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$13M thru Jun 2026+$3.5M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility39.8%26.5%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 8, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

16% of BATT · 19% of SMOG
HoldingBATTSMOG
TSLA7.52%8.49%
BE5.04%6.33%
RIVN1.94%2.88%
ENS1.54%0.98%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBATTSMOGGap
Consumer Discretionary10.9%14.0%−3.1%
Materials15.9%1.5%+14.4%
Industrials6.6%8.5%−1.9%
Utilities0.0%11.5%−11.5%
Technology0.0%5.0%−5.0%
Financials0.0%0.6%−0.6%

More: full overlap table · BATT holdings · SMOG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.