BCIL vs MKOR

Bancreek International Large Cap ETF against Matthews Korea Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
10%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
1 bp
MKOR is cheaper
1-year return gap
68.2 pts
MKOR is ahead
Larger fund
MKOR
$150M

Side by side

BCILMKOR
FundBancreek International Large Cap ETFMatthews Korea Active ETF
IssuerBancreekMatthews Asia
CategoryDeveloped ex-USSingle Country
Expense ratio0.80%0.79%
Assets$95M$150M
Average daily dollar volume$94K$273K
ListedMar 20, 2024Oct 29, 2010
FrenzyCap score2224
1-month return−3.9%−15.6%
3-month return−1.4%−6.8%
Year to date+2.1%+59.2%
1-year return−1.5%+66.7%
30-day volatility15.6%43.0%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−12.8%−29.4%
Trailing 12-month yield0.73%1.65%
Holdings3152
Top 10 weight40.0%52.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$11M thru May 2026+$2.5M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

10% of BCIL · 11% of MKOR
HoldingBCILMKOR
SK HYNIX INC4.16%4.70%
SK SQUARE CO LTD3.31%4.50%
HD HYUNDAI ELECTRIC CO LTD2.93%2.18%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBCILMKORGap
Technology3.0%0.0%+3.0%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%0.7%−0.7%

More: full overlap table · BCIL holdings · MKOR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.