BINC vs PIM

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF against Franklin Master Intermediate Income Trust: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
5.2 pts
BINC is ahead
Larger fund
BINC
$16.8B

Side by side

BINCPIM
FundiShares Flexible Income Active ETFFranklin Master Intermediate Income Trust
IssueriSharesFranklin Templeton
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.40%—
Assets$16.8B$145M
Average daily dollar volume$145M$303K
ListedMay 19, 2023Apr 22, 1988
FrenzyCap score7728
1-month return−0.7%−1.0%
3-month return−2.5%−3.5%
Year to date−4.0%−10.5%
1-year return−5.0%−10.2%
30-day volatility2.7%15.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−13.2%
Trailing 12-month yield6.04%—
Holdings4,854—
Top 10 weight19.7%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$664M thru Jul 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 23, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BINC holdings · PIM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.