BOND vs RIGS

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against ALPS Strategic Income Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
RIGS is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.4 pts
RIGS is ahead
Larger fund
BOND
$8.7B

Side by side

BONDRIGS
FundPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded FundALPS Strategic Income Fund
IssuerPIMCOALPS
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%0.45%
Assets$8.7B$55M
Average daily dollar volume$102M$241K
ListedFeb 29, 2012Oct 7, 2013
FrenzyCap score6734
1-month return+1.0%+0.9%
3-month return−2.7%−1.7%
Year to date−4.8%−3.5%
1-year return−5.9%−4.5%
30-day volatility6.4%5.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.7%−6.3%
Trailing 12-month yield5.36%5.05%
Holdings1,61081
Top 10 weight37.7%31.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$584M thru Jun 2026−$2.3M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility9.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 23, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BOND · 2% of RIGS
HoldingBONDRIGS
MEXICO GOVT (UMS) 6%, due May 13, 20300.02%0.98%
SPRINGLEAF FINANCE CORP SR UNSEC 6.625%, due Jan 15, 20280.01%1.02%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · RIGS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.