BOND vs XAGG

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund against Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
4 bp
XAGG is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BOND
$8.6B

Side by side

BONDXAGG
FundPIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded FundEaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF
IssuerPIMCOEaton Vance
CategoryMultisector BondMultisector Bond
Expense ratio0.54%0.50%
Assets$8.6B$1.2B
Average daily dollar volume$97M$30M
ListedFeb 29, 2012Jul 28, 1997
FrenzyCap score6763
1-month return−1.4%−1.5%
3-month return−2.9%−2.4%
Year to date−5.7%−3.9%
1-year return−6.8%—
30-day volatility6.0%4.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.7%−6.3%
Trailing 12-month yield5.41%6.33%
Holdings1,609987
Top 10 weight38.7%28.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$584M thru Jun 2026+$304M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility6.1%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BOND · 0% of XAGG
HoldingBONDXAGG
METAL 2017-1 A 144A, due Oct 15, 20420.02%0.03%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBONDXAGGGap
Technology0.0%0.0%−0.0%

More: full overlap table · BOND holdings · XAGG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.