BOXX vs GCSH

Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF against Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
BOXX
$12.7B

Side by side

BOXXGCSH
FundAlpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETFGuggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF
IssuerAlpha ArchitectGuggenheim
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio0.19%—
Assets$12.7B$138M
Average daily dollar volume$450M$1.9M
ListedDec 27, 2022Mar 12, 2014
FrenzyCap score6759
1-month return+0.4%−0.1%
3-month return+1.0%−0.6%
Year to date+3.1%—
1-year return+4.0%—
30-day volatility0.4%1.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−0.1%−1.2%
Trailing 12-month yield—1.25%
Holdings8216
Top 10 weight100.0%20.2%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$2.0B thru Jun 2026+$50M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BOXX holdings · GCSH holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.