BUFD vs BUFP

FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF against PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
45 bp
BUFP is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.0 pts
BUFP is ahead
Larger fund
BUFD
$2.2B

Side by side

BUFDBUFP
FundFT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETFPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
IssuerFT VestPGIM
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.50%
Assets$2.2B$226M
Average daily dollar volume$10M$3.7M
ListedJan 20, 2021Jun 11, 2024
FrenzyCap score4156
1-month return+0.4%+0.5%
3-month return+3.1%+3.6%
Year to date+8.5%+10.2%
1-year return+10.4%+12.4%
30-day volatility4.0%5.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−3.4%−4.4%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.01%
Holdings1313
Top 10 weight83.3%83.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$96M thru May 2026+$56M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFD · 0% of BUFP

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFD holdings · BUFP holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.