BUFP vs BUFQ

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF against FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
50 bp
BUFP is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.3 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFPBUFQ
FundPGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETFFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF
IssuerPGIMFT Vest
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.50%1.00%
Assets$226M$1.7B
Average daily dollar volume$3.7M$9.1M
ListedJun 11, 2024Jun 15, 2022
FrenzyCap score5633
1-month return+0.5%−0.9%
3-month return+3.6%+4.7%
Year to date+10.2%+12.4%
1-year return+12.4%+14.8%
30-day volatility5.2%8.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.4%−5.4%
Trailing 12-month yield0.01%—
Holdings135
Top 10 weight83.3%100.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$56M thru Jul 2026+$155M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFP · 0% of BUFQ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFP holdings · BUFQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.