BUFQ vs NJUL

FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF against Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - July: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
21 bp
NJUL is cheaper
1-year return gap
5.9 pts
BUFQ is ahead
Larger fund
BUFQ
$1.7B

Side by side

BUFQNJUL
FundFT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETFInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - July
IssuerFT VestInnovator
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio1.00%0.79%
Assets$1.7B$271M
Average daily dollar volume$9.1M$762K
ListedJun 15, 2022Jun 30, 2020
FrenzyCap score3333
1-month return−0.9%−1.3%
3-month return+4.7%+3.9%
Year to date+12.4%+7.3%
1-year return+14.8%+8.8%
30-day volatility8.4%10.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.4%−5.1%
Trailing 12-month yield——
Holdings56
Top 10 weight100.0%103.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$155M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · BUFQ holdings · NJUL holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.