BUFR vs JULZ

FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF against TrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
16 bp
JULZ is cheaper
1-year return gap
12.9 pts
BUFR is ahead
Larger fund
BUFR
$10.9B

Side by side

BUFRJULZ
FundFT Vest Laddered Buffer ETFTrueShares Structured Outcome (July) ETF
IssuerFT VestTrueShares
CategoryBufferBuffer
Expense ratio0.95%0.79%
Assets$10.9B$33M
Average daily dollar volume$45M$46K
ListedAug 10, 2020Jun 30, 2020
FrenzyCap score4919
1-month return+0.5%−0.2%
3-month return+3.8%+3.5%
Year to date+10.5%+10.4%
1-year return+12.7%−0.2%
30-day volatility5.2%8.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−4.6%−17.4%
Trailing 12-month yield—10.84%
Holdings1312
Top 10 weight83.4%99.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$454M thru May 2026+$11M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of BUFR · 0% of JULZ

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · BUFR holdings · JULZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.