BULD vs SHOC

Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF against Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
18%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
9 bp
SHOC is cheaper
1-year return gap
31.9 pts
SHOC is ahead
Larger fund
SHOC
$246M

Side by side

BULDSHOC
FundPacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETFStrive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
IssuerPacerStrive
CategoryIndustrialsSemiconductors
Expense ratio0.49%0.40%
Assets$15M$246M
Average daily dollar volume$120K$744K
ListedMay 4, 2022Oct 5, 2022
FrenzyCap score2551
1-month return+10.5%+6.9%
3-month return+7.1%+2.1%
Year to date+43.0%+61.4%
1-year return+36.2%+68.1%
30-day volatility23.4%32.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−16.0%−25.2%
Trailing 12-month yield0.81%0.12%
Holdings5731
Top 10 weight62.8%75.7%
Look-through P/E75.142.5
Holdings vs fair value+2.1%−3.7%
Holdings above 200-day average82%87%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$9.7M thru Jul 2026+$12M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Apr 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

24% of BULD · 18% of SHOC
HoldingBULDSHOC
AMAT8.28%6.53%
KLAC5.52%5.10%
LRCX8.43%4.87%
TER1.50%1.16%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorBULDSHOCGap
Technology38.0%85.3%−47.3%
Industrials20.5%4.9%+15.6%
Materials0.2%0.4%−0.2%
Energy0.2%0.0%+0.2%

More: full overlap table · BULD holdings · SHOC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.