CAM vs FTMN

AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF against Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
1 shared positions
Fee gap
8 bp
CAM is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
CAM
$1.2B

Side by side

CAMFTMN
FundAB California Intermediate Municipal ETFFranklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF
IssuerAllianceBernsteinFranklin Templeton
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.27%0.35%
Assets$1.2B$273M
Average daily dollar volume$8.7M$3.5M
ListedAug 6, 1990May 22, 2018
FrenzyCap score6852
1-month return−0.4%−0.8%
3-month return−1.7%−4.0%
Year to date−3.1%−5.8%
1-year return−3.4%—
30-day volatility4.2%8.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.9%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.33%3.11%
Holdings430221
Top 10 weight15.3%18.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$46M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CAM · 0% of FTMN
HoldingCAMFTMN
Territory of Guam 5%, due Nov 15, 20310.03%0.13%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CAM holdings · FTMN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.