CAM vs MUC

AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF against BLACKROCK MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA QUALITY FUND, INC: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
6.3 pts
CAM is ahead
Larger fund
MUC
$1.2B

Side by side

CAMMUC
FundAB California Intermediate Municipal ETFBLACKROCK MUNIHOLDINGS CALIFORNIA QUALITY FUND, INC
IssuerAllianceBernsteiniShares
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.27%—
Assets$1.2B$1.2B
Average daily dollar volume$8.7M$7.9M
ListedAug 6, 1990Mar 6, 1998
FrenzyCap score6870
1-month return−0.4%−3.8%
3-month return−1.7%−9.1%
Year to date−3.1%−8.2%
1-year return−3.4%−9.7%
30-day volatility4.2%14.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.9%−12.8%
Trailing 12-month yield3.33%—
Holdings430—
Top 10 weight15.3%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$46M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CAM holdings · MUC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.