CAM vs PZT

AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF against Invesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
1 bp
CAM is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.1 pts
CAM is ahead
Larger fund
CAM
$1.2B

Side by side

CAMPZT
FundAB California Intermediate Municipal ETFInvesco New York AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
IssuerAllianceBernsteinInvesco
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.27%0.28%
Assets$1.2B$130M
Average daily dollar volume$8.7M$2.1M
ListedAug 6, 1990Oct 11, 2007
FrenzyCap score6855
1-month return−0.4%−1.2%
3-month return−1.7%−5.4%
Year to date−3.1%−6.8%
1-year return−3.4%−7.6%
30-day volatility4.2%11.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.9%−10.9%
Trailing 12-month yield3.33%4.08%
Holdings4301,029
Top 10 weight15.3%9.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$46M thru May 2026+$4.5M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CAM · 0% of PZT

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CAM holdings · PZT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.