CBON vs IUSB
VanEck China Bond ETF against iShares Trust iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
44 bp
IUSB is cheaper
1-year return gap
13.7 pts
CBON is ahead
Larger fund
IUSB
$49.3B
Side by side
| CBON | IUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | VanEck China Bond ETF | iShares Trust iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF |
| Issuer | VanEck | iShares |
| Category | Core Bond | Core Bond |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.06% |
| Assets | $34M | $49.3B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $268K | $474M |
| Listed | Nov 10, 2014 | Jun 10, 2014 |
| FrenzyCap score | 28 | 96 |
| 1-month return | −0.2% | −1.1% |
| 3-month return | +0.9% | −2.2% |
| Year to date | +5.8% | −4.5% |
| 1-year return | +8.1% | −5.6% |
| 30-day volatility | 2.4% | 4.8% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −1.5% | −7.0% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.42% | 4.37% |
| Holdings | 43 | 18,285 |
| Top 10 weight | 40.7% | 3.8% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$4.7M thru Jun 2026 | +$7.2B thru Jul 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 7.0% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
0% of CBON · 0% of IUSBNo holdings in common.
Sector mix of the stock holdings
No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.
More: full overlap table · CBON holdings · IUSB holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.