CBTJ vs ZAUG

Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January against Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
10 bp
CBTJ is cheaper
1-year return gap
30.5 pts
ZAUG is ahead
Larger fund
ZAUG
$163M

Side by side

CBTJZAUG
FundCalamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - JanuaryInnovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August
IssuerCalamosInnovator
CategoryFloor & ProtectionFloor & Protection
Expense ratio0.69%0.79%
Assets$24M$163M
Average daily dollar volume$76K$833K
ListedFeb 3, 2025Jul 31, 2024
FrenzyCap score3130
1-month return−1.2%+0.3%
3-month return+17.1%+1.4%
Year to date−4.4%+4.9%
1-year return−24.8%+5.7%
30-day volatility25.4%2.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−39.7%−1.7%
Trailing 12-month yield1.52%—
Holdings57
Top 10 weight146.7%104.4%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$4.4M thru Jul 2026−$8.9M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CBTJ holdings · ZAUG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.