CGBL vs GUG

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF against Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
17.7 pts
CGBL is ahead
Larger fund
CGBL
$7.8B

Side by side

CGBLGUG
FundCapital Group Core Balanced ETFGuggenheim Active Allocation Fund
IssuerCapital GroupGuggenheim
CategoryAllocationAllocation
Expense ratio0.33%—
Assets$7.8B$456M
Average daily dollar volume$48M$1.8M
ListedSep 26, 2023Nov 24, 2021
FrenzyCap score7551
1-month return−1.9%−0.7%
3-month return−1.5%−10.1%
Year to date+4.0%−9.8%
1-year return+5.3%−12.5%
30-day volatility8.7%17.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.9%−16.6%
Trailing 12-month yield1.96%—
Holdings80—
Top 10 weight58.9%—
Look-through P/E25.4—
Holdings vs fair value+3.2%—
Holdings above 200-day average55%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.0B thru Jun 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 23, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CGBL holdings · GUG holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.