CIFC vs MULL
Corgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF against GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Fee gap
105 bp
CIFC is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MULL
$1.5B
Side by side
| CIFC | MULL | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Corgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF | GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF |
| Issuer | Corgi | GraniteShares |
| Category | Single-Stock Leveraged | Single-Stock Leveraged |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 1.50% |
| Assets | $81K | $1.5B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $305K | $117M |
| Listed | Jun 29, 2026 | Nov 11, 2024 |
| FrenzyCap score | 43 | 52 |
| 1-month return | −79.0% | −32.7% |
| 3-month return | −91.5% | −28.2% |
| Year to date | — | +409.0% |
| 1-year return | — | +750.5% |
| 30-day volatility | 168.2% | 99.5% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −92.1% | −68.2% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 1.90% |
| Holdings | 2 | 7 |
| Top 10 weight | 197.9% | 371.8% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | — | +$99M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 99.1% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
More: full overlap table · CIFC holdings · MULL holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.