CMF vs FTMN

iShares California Muni Bond ETF against Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
27 bp
CMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
CMF
$5.2B

Side by side

CMFFTMN
FundiShares California Muni Bond ETFFranklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF
IssueriSharesFranklin Templeton
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Assets$5.2B$273M
Average daily dollar volume$159M$3.5M
ListedOct 4, 2007May 22, 2018
FrenzyCap score9852
1-month return−0.2%−0.8%
3-month return−2.8%−4.0%
Year to date−4.4%−5.8%
1-year return−4.6%—
30-day volatility6.1%8.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.1%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield3.07%3.11%
Holdings1,863221
Top 10 weight4.1%18.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$349M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CMF · 0% of FTMN

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CMF holdings · FTMN holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.