CMF vs MPA

iShares California Muni Bond ETF against BLACKROCK MUNIYIELD PENNSYLVANIA QUALITY FUND: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
7.6 pts
CMF is ahead
Larger fund
CMF
$5.3B

Side by side

CMFMPA
FundiShares California Muni Bond ETFBLACKROCK MUNIYIELD PENNSYLVANIA QUALITY FUND
IssueriSharesiShares
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.08%—
Assets$5.3B$130M
Average daily dollar volume$155M$611K
ListedOct 4, 2007Nov 4, 1992
FrenzyCap score9833
1-month return+1.8%+1.6%
3-month return−2.3%−7.9%
Year to date−3.6%−9.3%
1-year return−3.9%−11.5%
30-day volatility6.0%15.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−8.1%−17.4%
Trailing 12-month yield3.05%—
Holdings1,878—
Top 10 weight4.0%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$291M thru Aug 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 22, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · CMF holdings · MPA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.