COWG vs FORH

Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF against Formidable ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
7%
5 shared positions
Fee gap
70 bp
COWG is cheaper
1-year return gap
22.2 pts
COWG is ahead
Larger fund
COWG
$2.2B

Side by side

COWGFORH
FundPacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETFFormidable ETF
IssuerPacerFormidable
CategoryCash Flow & BuybacksAllocation
Expense ratio0.49%1.19%
Assets$2.2B$20M
Average daily dollar volume$9.9M$32K
ListedDec 21, 2022Apr 29, 2021
FrenzyCap score6318
1-month return+0.8%−2.6%
3-month return+4.5%−2.8%
Year to date+12.9%−2.0%
1-year return+11.1%−11.1%
30-day volatility17.6%14.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−10.7%−14.2%
Trailing 12-month yield0.75%1.86%
Holdings10366
Top 10 weight32.8%46.4%
Look-through P/E30.0—
Holdings vs fair value+7.9%+19.4%
Holdings above 200-day average80%39%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$65M thru Jul 2026−$631K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility22.0%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 7, 2026third-party dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

7% of COWG · 11% of FORH
HoldingCOWGFORH
CRDO3.15%3.09%
VEEV1.61%2.87%
DOCU1.38%1.61%
FSLR0.45%1.81%
VNOM0.41%2.10%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCOWGFORHGap
Technology73.9%12.1%+61.8%
Industrials6.3%13.7%−7.4%
Health Care9.7%7.5%+2.2%
Financials0.3%15.1%−14.9%
Materials1.6%7.8%−6.1%
Energy1.4%4.0%−2.6%
Utilities1.2%3.2%−2.0%
Consumer Staples1.6%2.4%−0.8%
Communication Services3.1%0.0%+3.1%
Consumer Discretionary0.9%1.7%−0.9%
Real Estate0.0%2.2%−2.2%

More: full overlap table · COWG holdings · FORH holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.