CTA vs IMF

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF against Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
10 bp
IMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
12.0 pts
IMF is ahead
Larger fund
CTA
$1.5B

Side by side

CTAIMF
FundSimplify Managed Futures Strategy ETFInvesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
IssuerSimplifyInvesco
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.75%0.65%
Assets$1.5B$301M
Average daily dollar volume$20M$358K
ListedMar 7, 2022Mar 17, 2025
FrenzyCap score6042
1-month return+1.1%−2.3%
3-month return+6.8%+1.0%
Year to date+10.2%+14.6%
1-year return+5.4%+17.4%
30-day volatility23.0%7.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−22.0%−4.5%
Trailing 12-month yield5.06%0.88%
Holdings11879
Top 10 weight97.0%65.3%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$232M thru Jun 2026+$19M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility23.8%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of CTA · 0% of IMF

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · CTA holdings · IMF holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.