CVRD vs QLTY

Madison Covered Call ETF against GMO U.S. Quality ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
24%
9 shared positions
Fee gap
42 bp
QLTY is cheaper
1-year return gap
21.9 pts
QLTY is ahead
Larger fund
QLTY
$5.4B

Side by side

CVRDQLTY
FundMadison Covered Call ETFGMO U.S. Quality ETF
IssuerMadisonGMO
CategoryCovered CallQuality
Expense ratio0.92%0.50%
Assets$30M$5.4B
Average daily dollar volume$4K$16M
ListedAug 21, 2023Nov 13, 2023
FrenzyCap score3261
1-month return−1.8%+3.9%
3-month return+0.9%+5.3%
Year to date−1.1%+14.2%
1-year return−2.9%+19.1%
30-day volatility9.8%10.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−7.9%−11.7%
Trailing 12-month yield7.71%0.64%
Holdings7042
Top 10 weight38.9%48.9%
Look-through P/E19.127.1
Holdings vs fair value+8.0%+1.7%
Holdings above 200-day average64%79%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$1.8M thru Jun 2026+$709M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

27% of CVRD · 31% of QLTY
HoldingCVRDQLTY
AMZN4.03%3.90%
MSFT3.85%7.17%
AVGO3.55%4.79%
META2.64%4.32%
V3.65%2.58%
CRM2.45%2.54%
Accenture PLC2.06%2.29%
STZ2.52%1.53%
SNPS2.51%1.49%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorCVRDQLTYGap
Technology32.9%44.0%−11.1%
Industrials16.6%13.0%+3.6%
Health Care4.2%19.1%−15.0%
Consumer Discretionary8.9%9.9%−1.0%
Consumer Staples10.1%6.4%+3.7%
Financials5.8%3.2%+2.6%
Communication Services5.2%1.7%+3.5%
Real Estate3.0%0.0%+3.0%
Energy3.0%0.0%+3.0%
Utilities2.5%0.0%+2.5%
Materials2.2%0.0%+2.2%

More: full overlap table · CVRD holdings · QLTY holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.