DBMF vs MFUT

iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF against Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
33 bp
DBMF is cheaper
1-year return gap
9.7 pts
MFUT is ahead
Larger fund
DBMF
$3.9B

Side by side

DBMFMFUT
FundiMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETFCambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
IssueriMGPCambria
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.85%1.18%
Assets$3.9B$39M
Average daily dollar volume$132M$278K
ListedMay 7, 2019May 28, 2024
FrenzyCap score6531
1-month return+3.2%−1.7%
3-month return+4.5%+0.7%
Year to date+17.3%+20.7%
1-year return+14.7%+24.4%
30-day volatility11.1%9.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.1%−9.9%
Trailing 12-month yield4.82%—
Holdings18131
Top 10 weight79.0%21.3%
Look-through P/E—24.1
Holdings vs fair value—+6.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—67%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$539M thru Jun 2026+$7.8M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility44.6%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of DBMF · 0% of MFUT

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorDBMFMFUTGap
Technology0.0%15.6%−15.6%
Materials0.0%9.5%−9.5%
Industrials0.0%5.4%−5.4%
Consumer Staples0.0%4.6%−4.6%
Health Care0.0%3.8%−3.8%
Energy0.0%3.1%−3.1%
Utilities0.0%2.7%−2.7%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%1.6%−1.6%
Real Estate0.0%0.9%−0.9%

More: full overlap table · DBMF holdings · MFUT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.