EIM vs PZA

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund against Invesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
2.6 pts
PZA is ahead
Larger fund
PZA
$4.1B

Side by side

EIMPZA
FundEaton Vance Municipal Bond FundInvesco National AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF
IssuerEaton VanceInvesco
CategoryNational MuniNational Muni
Expense ratio—0.28%
Assets$458M$4.1B
Average daily dollar volume$2.8M$100M
ListedAug 28, 2002Oct 11, 2007
FrenzyCap score5480
1-month return−1.4%−1.5%
3-month return−7.5%−5.5%
Year to date−8.4%−6.9%
1-year return−10.3%−7.7%
30-day volatility18.6%8.8%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.4%−10.4%
Trailing 12-month yield—4.10%
Holdings—6,664
Top 10 weight—1.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$400M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility—9.4%
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · EIM holdings · PZA holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.