ESPO vs METV

VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF against Roundhill Metaverse ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
14%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
4 bp
ESPO is cheaper
1-year return gap
17.8 pts
METV is ahead
Larger fund
ESPO
$255M

Side by side

ESPOMETV
FundVanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETFRoundhill Metaverse ETF
IssuerVanEckRoundhill
CategoryGaming & BettingInternet & Innovation
Expense ratio0.55%0.59%
Assets$255M$232M
Average daily dollar volume$1.3M$1.1M
ListedOct 16, 2018Jun 29, 2021
FrenzyCap score4644
1-month return+5.1%+6.6%
3-month return+9.1%+13.9%
Year to date−3.4%+14.4%
1-year return−16.6%+1.2%
30-day volatility18.1%21.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−28.2%−28.2%
Trailing 12-month yield1.29%0.16%
Holdings2741
Top 10 weight59.7%52.4%
Look-through P/E—71.1
Holdings vs fair value—−1.3%
Holdings above 200-day average—65%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$22M thru Jun 2026−$33M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility20.1%30.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 8, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

25% of ESPO · 17% of METV
HoldingESPOMETV
RBLX6.14%9.65%
U4.86%3.56%
TTWO6.45%3.26%
NTES7.23%0.77%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorESPOMETVGap
Technology24.7%59.9%−35.2%
Consumer Discretionary5.7%4.9%+0.9%
Industrials0.0%3.8%−3.8%
Financials0.0%2.9%−2.9%

More: full overlap table · ESPO holdings · METV holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.