FAX vs IPAC

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund, Inc against iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
27.1 pts
IPAC is ahead
Larger fund
IPAC
$2.7B

Side by side

FAXIPAC
Fundabrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund, InciShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
IssuerabrdniShares
CategoryAsia-PacificAsia-Pacific
Expense ratio—0.09%
Assets$536M$2.7B
Average daily dollar volume$3.1M$6.9M
ListedFeb 10, 1988Jun 10, 2014
FrenzyCap score5686
1-month return−6.8%−2.9%
3-month return−10.2%+3.6%
Year to date−15.3%+14.8%
1-year return−15.3%+11.9%
30-day volatility18.6%13.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−22.7%−11.5%
Trailing 12-month yield—3.80%
Holdings—1,346
Top 10 weight—18.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—+$90M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—22.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · FAX holdings · IPAC holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.