FORH vs TFGZ

Formidable ETF against Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
7%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
40 bp
TFGZ is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
FORH
$20M

Side by side

FORHTFGZ
FundFormidable ETFThornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF
IssuerFormidableThornburg
CategoryAllocationLarge Cap Growth
Expense ratio1.19%0.79%
Assets$20M—
Average daily dollar volume$32K$128K
ListedApr 29, 2021Mar 31, 2026
FrenzyCap score1822
1-month return−2.6%−0.2%
3-month return−2.8%−1.8%
Year to date−2.0%—
1-year return−11.1%—
30-day volatility14.4%19.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−14.2%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield1.86%—
Holdings6644
Top 10 weight46.4%46.4%
Look-through P/E—38.5
Holdings vs fair value+19.4%−1.6%
Holdings above 200-day average39%49%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$631K thru Jun 2026−$280K thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

7% of FORH · 11% of TFGZ
HoldingFORHTFGZ
CRDO3.09%5.49%
TLN2.18%2.27%
RPRX2.00%2.91%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorFORHTFGZGap
Technology12.1%42.6%−30.5%
Industrials13.7%20.6%−6.9%
Financials15.1%5.1%+10.0%
Health Care7.5%5.5%+2.0%
Materials7.8%2.6%+5.2%
Consumer Discretionary1.7%4.4%−2.6%
Utilities3.2%2.3%+0.9%
Energy4.0%0.0%+4.0%
Consumer Staples2.4%1.3%+1.1%
Real Estate2.2%0.0%+2.2%
Communication Services0.0%0.7%−0.7%

More: full overlap table · FORH holdings · TFGZ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.