GCSH vs ICSH

Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF against iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
ICSH
$9.0B

Side by side

GCSHICSH
FundGuggenheim Ultra Short Income ETFiShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF
IssuerGuggenheimiShares
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio—0.08%
Assets$138M$9.0B
Average daily dollar volume$1.9M$90M
ListedMar 12, 2014Dec 11, 2013
FrenzyCap score5994
1-month return−0.1%−0.0%
3-month return−0.6%−0.2%
Year to date—−0.4%
1-year return—−0.6%
30-day volatility1.8%0.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.2%−1.0%
Trailing 12-month yield1.25%4.14%
Holdings216410
Top 10 weight20.2%5.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$50M thru Jun 2026+$871M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility—6.9%
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of GCSH · 0% of ICSH

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · GCSH holdings · ICSH holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.