HECA vs MATR

Hedgeye Capital Allocation ETF against Harbor Multi-Asset Total Return ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
15%
4 shared positions
Fee gap
50 bp
MATR is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
HECA
$287M

Side by side

HECAMATR
FundHedgeye Capital Allocation ETFHarbor Multi-Asset Total Return ETF
IssuerHedgeyeHarbor
CategoryAllocationMultisector Bond
Expense ratio1.30%0.80%
Assets$287M$10M
Average daily dollar volume$2.0M$15K
ListedJun 30, 2025Sep 13, 2023
FrenzyCap score2810
1-month return−1.8%−2.4%
3-month return−1.4%—
Year to date−3.0%—
1-year return−6.9%—
30-day volatility9.0%10.2%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.2%−3.4%
Trailing 12-month yield2.08%—
Holdings1625
Top 10 weight84.8%71.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$86M thru Jul 2026−$686K thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 15, 2026third-party dataas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

22% of HECA · 18% of MATR
HoldingHECAMATR
XLK6.28%5.78%
FLJP4.27%7.51%
DBMF5.95%3.47%
IGV5.19%1.08%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · HECA holdings · MATR holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.