HF vs RHRX

DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF against Adaptive Tactical Rotation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
11%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
32 bp
RHRX is cheaper
1-year return gap
11.4 pts
RHRX is ahead
Larger fund
RHRX
$58M

Side by side

HFRHRX
FundDGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETFAdaptive Tactical Rotation ETF
IssuerDGAAdaptive
CategoryLong/Short & Market NeutralTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio1.70%1.38%
Assets$21M$58M
Average daily dollar volume$6K$405K
ListedAug 2, 2023Sep 20, 2012
FrenzyCap score1413
1-month return+0.3%+0.0%
3-month return+1.6%+1.0%
Year to date+7.4%+17.5%
1-year return+6.6%+17.9%
30-day volatility3.0%8.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−3.1%−6.8%
Trailing 12-month yield0.88%—
Holdings167
Top 10 weight83.8%98.6%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$24K thru Jul 2026+$13M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Jul 31, 2026SEC filingas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

11% of HF · 65% of RHRX
HoldingHFRHRX
SPYG8.90%18.29%
SPY1.99%47.01%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · HF holdings · RHRX holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.