ICSH vs SCUS

iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF against Schwab Ultra-Short Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
ICSH is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.1 pts
SCUS is ahead
Larger fund
ICSH
$9.0B

Side by side

ICSHSCUS
FundiShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETFSchwab Ultra-Short Income ETF
IssueriSharesSchwab
CategoryUltra-Short BondUltra-Short Bond
Expense ratio0.08%0.14%
Assets$9.0B$242M
Average daily dollar volume$90M$3.3M
ListedDec 11, 2013Aug 12, 2024
FrenzyCap score9463
1-month return−0.0%−0.0%
3-month return−0.2%−0.3%
Year to date−0.4%−0.4%
1-year return−0.6%−0.6%
30-day volatility0.9%1.1%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−1.0%−1.0%
Trailing 12-month yield4.14%3.87%
Holdings410154
Top 10 weight5.9%13.5%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$871M thru Jul 2026+$18M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility6.9%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of ICSH · 1% of SCUS
HoldingICSHSCUS
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 3.88%, due Oct 27, 20280.24%0.47%
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD (NEW Y MTN 4.31%, due Jun 13, 20280.14%0.62%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · ICSH holdings · SCUS holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.