ION vs SETM

ProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF against Sprott Funds Trust Sprott Critical Materials ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
14%
10 shared positions
Fee gap
7 bp
ION is cheaper
1-year return gap
3.5 pts
ION is ahead
Larger fund
SETM
$427M

Side by side

IONSETM
FundProShares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETFSprott Funds Trust Sprott Critical Materials ETF
IssuerProSharesSprott
CategoryEVs & BatteriesMetals & Mining
Expense ratio0.58%0.65%
Assets$9.9M$427M
Average daily dollar volume$85K$5.1M
ListedNov 29, 2022Feb 1, 2023
FrenzyCap score3051
1-month return−15.3%−18.1%
3-month return−14.7%−12.0%
Year to date−23.7%−13.9%
1-year return−2.7%−6.2%
30-day volatility21.9%33.4%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−43.3%−38.2%
Trailing 12-month yield2.09%1.82%
Holdings54160
Top 10 weight33.9%41.9%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average—12%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$1.9M thru May 2026+$102M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility44.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 26, 2026issuer dataas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

30% of ION · 16% of SETM
HoldingIONSETM
ALB3.19%3.69%
SQM3.19%3.15%
PLS2.84%4.20%
IGO3.33%1.62%
LTR3.43%1.57%
ELV2.76%0.71%
SGML3.41%0.43%
ANTM2.17%0.34%
INCO3.39%0.28%
ERA2.44%0.22%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorIONSETMGap
Materials13.0%53.3%−40.3%
Real Estate3.4%0.0%+3.4%
Health Care2.8%0.0%+2.8%
Energy2.1%0.0%+2.1%
Financials1.9%0.0%+1.9%
Industrials1.8%0.0%+1.8%
Utilities0.6%0.0%+0.6%

More: full overlap table · ION holdings · SETM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.