JCAL vs NYM

JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond ETF against AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
3 shared positions
Fee gap
7 bp
NYM is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
NYM
$1.3B

Side by side

JCALNYM
FundJPMorgan California Tax Free Bond ETFAB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF
IssuerJPMorganAllianceBernstein
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.34%0.27%
Assets$508M$1.3B
Average daily dollar volume$6.4M$2.8M
ListedDec 23, 1996Jan 9, 1989
FrenzyCap score5565
1-month return−0.6%−0.2%
3-month return−2.7%−2.0%
Year to date—−2.8%
1-year return——
30-day volatility6.3%4.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−6.8%−5.5%
Trailing 12-month yield1.16%2.77%
Holdings320408
Top 10 weight11.5%15.1%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months—−$1.3M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of JCAL · 0% of NYM
HoldingJCALNYM
MAIN STR NAT VAR 12/55, due Dec 1, 20550.23%0.16%
PUERTO RICO ZERO 07/29, due Jul 1, 20290.18%0.14%
SOUTHEAST VAR 01/56, due Jan 1, 20560.06%0.08%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · JCAL holdings · NYM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.