JMUB vs MUNI
JPMorgan Municipal ETF against PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
4%
49 shared positions
Fee gap
17 bp
JMUB is cheaper
1-year return gap
0.8 pts
MUNI is ahead
Larger fund
JMUB
$8.7B
Side by side
| JMUB | MUNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | JPMorgan Municipal ETF | PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund |
| Issuer | JPMorgan | PIMCO |
| Category | National Muni | National Muni |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Assets | $8.7B | $3.5B |
| Average daily dollar volume | $176M | $76M |
| Listed | Oct 29, 2018 | Nov 30, 2009 |
| FrenzyCap score | 90 | 72 |
| 1-month return | −0.5% | −0.2% |
| 3-month return | −2.8% | −2.2% |
| Year to date | −4.5% | −3.8% |
| 1-year return | −4.9% | −4.1% |
| 30-day volatility | 6.1% | 5.7% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −7.8% | −7.6% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 3.55% | 3.41% |
| Holdings | 2,181 | 727 |
| Top 10 weight | 5.5% | 9.3% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$751M thru May 2026 | +$296M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | 5.5% |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 21, 2026issuer data | as of Oct 20, 2026issuer data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
4% of JMUB · 10% of MUNI| Holding | JMUB | MUNI |
|---|---|---|
| ALABAMA TOLL RD 5% 10/32, due Oct 1, 2032 | 0.60% | 1.45% |
| SOUTHEAST VAR 01/56, due Jan 1, 2056 | 0.25% | 0.33% |
| TARRANT CNTY VAR 11/64, due Nov 15, 2064 | 0.22% | 0.29% |
| TEXAS TRANSN VAR 10/44, due Oct 1, 2044 | 0.18% | 0.44% |
| TOBACCO 5% 06/46, due Jun 1, 2046 | 0.18% | 0.17% |
| NEW YORK N Y GO VAR 10/46, due Oct 1, 2046 | 0.15% | 0.41% |
| NORTH 6.25% 07/55, due Jul 1, 2055 | 0.14% | 0.14% |
| COLORADO HEALTH 5% 08/44, due Aug 1, 2044 | 0.14% | 0.20% |
| NORTH CAROLINA 7% 01/58, due Jan 1, 2058 | 0.13% | 0.30% |
| DISTRICT VAR 04/60, due Apr 1, 2060 | 0.13% | 0.39% |
| NORTH CAROLINA 6.5% 01/56, due Jan 1, 2056 | 0.14% | 0.13% |
| BLACK BELT 5% 11/36, due Nov 1, 2036 | 0.12% | 0.26% |
| LOUISIANA PUB 5% 05/30, due May 15, 2030 | 0.10% | 0.13% |
| PUERTO RICO ZERO 07/51, due Jul 1, 2051 | 0.10% | 0.19% |
| SOUTHEAST VAR 01/54, due Jan 1, 2054 | 0.07% | 0.17% |
| METROPOLITAN 5% 07/34, due Jul 1, 2034 | 0.07% | 0.33% |
| IDAHO HSG & 6.25% 01/56, due Jan 1, 2056 | 0.06% | 0.08% |
| IOWA FIN AUTH VAR 12/50, due Dec 1, 2050 | 0.06% | 0.09% |
| LEE CNTY FLA VAR 04/65, due Apr 1, 2065 | 0.06% | 0.11% |
| KENTUCKY INC KY 5% 05/36, due May 1, 2036 | 0.06% | 0.10% |
| TENNERGY CORP VAR 12/51, due Dec 1, 2051 | 0.12% | 0.06% |
| COLORADO HEALTH VAR 11/59, due Nov 15, 2059 | 0.06% | 0.17% |
| NEW YORK N Y 5% 02/50, due Feb 1, 2050 | 0.06% | 0.61% |
| PUERTO RICO ZERO 07/46, due Jul 1, 2046 | 0.06% | 0.67% |
| SOUTHEAST ENERGY 5% 11/35, due Nov 1, 2035 | 0.05% | 0.25% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.
More: full overlap table · JMUB holdings · MUNI holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.