KMLM vs MFUT

KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF against Cambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
28 bp
KMLM is cheaper
1-year return gap
10.5 pts
MFUT is ahead
Larger fund
KMLM
$298M

Side by side

KMLMMFUT
FundKraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETFCambria Chesapeake Pure Trend ETF
IssuerKraneSharesCambria
CategoryManaged FuturesManaged Futures
Expense ratio0.90%1.18%
Assets$298M$39M
Average daily dollar volume$11M$278K
ListedDec 1, 2020May 28, 2024
FrenzyCap score5031
1-month return+0.7%−1.7%
3-month return+3.3%+0.7%
Year to date+18.8%+20.7%
1-year return+13.9%+24.4%
30-day volatility11.6%9.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.6%−9.9%
Trailing 12-month yield4.23%—
Holdings26131
Top 10 weight102.7%21.3%
Look-through P/E—24.1
Holdings vs fair value—+6.8%
Holdings above 200-day average—67%
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$35M thru Jun 2026+$7.8M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility27.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filingas of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of KMLM · 0% of MFUT

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorKMLMMFUTGap
Technology0.0%15.6%−15.6%
Materials0.0%9.5%−9.5%
Industrials0.0%5.4%−5.4%
Consumer Staples0.0%4.6%−4.6%
Health Care0.0%3.8%−3.8%
Energy0.0%3.1%−3.1%
Utilities0.0%2.7%−2.7%
Consumer Discretionary0.0%1.6%−1.6%
Real Estate0.0%0.9%−0.9%

More: full overlap table · KMLM holdings · MFUT holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.