LCR vs NDAA
Leuthold Core ETF against Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
25%
6 shared positions
Fee gap
18 bp
NDAA is cheaper
1-year return gap
2.7 pts
NDAA is ahead
Larger fund
LCR
$69M
Side by side
| LCR | NDAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Leuthold Core ETF | Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF |
| Issuer | Leuthold | Ned |
| Category | Allocation | Tactical & Rotation |
| Expense ratio | 0.83% | 0.65% |
| Assets | $69M | $4.5M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $306K | $238K |
| Listed | Jan 3, 2020 | Oct 16, 2024 |
| FrenzyCap score | 29 | 30 |
| 1-month return | +0.0% | −1.3% |
| 3-month return | +3.0% | +1.4% |
| Year to date | +6.5% | +10.4% |
| 1-year return | +6.4% | +9.0% |
| 30-day volatility | 6.0% | 8.2% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −6.0% | −7.6% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.29% | 2.45% |
| Holdings | 36 | 29 |
| Top 10 weight | 66.0% | 66.0% |
| Look-through P/E | — | — |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | — |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | — |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | −$3.9M thru Jun 2026 | +$1.1M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing | as of Oct 1, 2026third-party data |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
28% of LCR · 30% of NDAA
Sector mix of the stock holdings
No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.
More: full overlap table · LCR holdings · NDAA holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.