LQD vs SCIO

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF against First Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
72 bp
LQD is cheaper
1-year return gap
4.0 pts
SCIO is ahead
Larger fund
LQD
$28.9B

Side by side

LQDSCIO
FundiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETFFirst Trust Structured Credit Income Opportunities ETF
IssueriSharesFirst Trust
CategoryInvestment-Grade CorporateInvestment-Grade Corporate
Expense ratio0.14%0.86%
Assets$28.9B$545M
Average daily dollar volume$3.6B$7.2M
ListedJul 22, 2002Feb 27, 2024
FrenzyCap score9150
1-month return−1.8%−1.1%
3-month return−2.9%−2.1%
Year to date−6.3%−3.9%
1-year return−8.3%−4.3%
30-day volatility6.8%4.5%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−9.8%−5.2%
Trailing 12-month yield4.89%5.72%
Holdings3,185465
Top 10 weight1.5%12.7%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$9.8B thru May 2026+$147M thru Jul 2026
30-day implied volatility8.3%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 20, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 20, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of LQD · 0% of SCIO

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · LQD holdings · SCIO holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.