MIGO vs MOOD

MIG Core ETF against Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
5%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
28 bp
MIGO is cheaper
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
MIGO
$758M

Side by side

MIGOMOOD
FundMIG Core ETFRelative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF
IssuerMIGRelative
CategoryLarge Cap BlendTactical & Rotation
Expense ratio0.45%0.73%
Assets$758M$127M
Average daily dollar volume$99K$1.1M
ListedFeb 20, 2026May 18, 2022
FrenzyCap score3532
1-month return−4.0%+0.4%
3-month return+1.9%+3.1%
Year to date—+16.8%
1-year return—+19.8%
30-day volatility18.3%4.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−13.4%−9.7%
Trailing 12-month yield—0.34%
Holdings5012
Top 10 weight51.5%100.1%
Look-through P/E29.7—
Holdings vs fair value+5.1%—
Holdings above 200-day average64%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$104M thru May 2026+$15M thru Jun 2026
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of Oct 14, 2026third-party dataas of Oct 1, 2026third-party data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

9% of MIGO · 5% of MOOD
HoldingMIGOMOOD
SMH3.90%2.58%
QQQ5.01%2.52%

Sector mix of the stock holdings

SectorMIGOMOODGap
Technology35.6%0.0%+35.6%
Health Care6.9%0.0%+6.9%
Financials4.0%0.0%+4.0%
Industrials3.6%0.0%+3.6%
Materials3.1%0.0%+3.1%
Consumer Discretionary3.0%0.0%+3.0%
Consumer Staples2.8%0.0%+2.8%
Communication Services0.4%0.0%+0.4%

More: full overlap table · MIGO holdings · MOOD holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.