MLPX vs SRV

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF against NXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
36.4 pts
MLPX is ahead
Larger fund
MLPX
$3.7B

Side by side

MLPXSRV
FundGlobal X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETFNXG Cushing Midstream Energy Fund
IssuerGlobal XNXG
CategoryMLPs & MidstreamMLPs & Midstream
Expense ratio0.45%—
Assets$3.7B$237M
Average daily dollar volume$23M$2.5M
ListedAug 6, 2013Aug 27, 2007
FrenzyCap score7248
1-month return+5.1%−10.3%
3-month return+0.3%−18.6%
Year to date+23.2%−2.7%
1-year return+26.3%−10.0%
30-day volatility18.7%34.3%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−10.1%−25.6%
Trailing 12-month yield4.11%—
Holdings31—
Top 10 weight67.5%—
Look-through P/E18.4—
Holdings vs fair value+18.4%—
Holdings above 200-day average57%—
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$286M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility26.5%—
Holdings as ofas of Oct 26, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · MLPX holdings · SRV holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.