NDAA vs THRV
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF against Prospera Income ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
12%
2 shared positions
Fee gap
115 bp
NDAA is cheaper
1-year return gap
16.4 pts
NDAA is ahead
Larger fund
THRV
$7.0M
Side by side
| NDAA | THRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF | Prospera Income ETF |
| Issuer | Ned | Prospera |
| Category | Tactical & Rotation | Multisector Bond |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 1.80% |
| Assets | $4.5M | $7.0M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $238K | $52K |
| Listed | Oct 16, 2024 | Sep 29, 2025 |
| FrenzyCap score | 30 | 8 |
| 1-month return | −1.3% | −1.8% |
| 3-month return | +1.4% | −4.0% |
| Year to date | +10.4% | −6.3% |
| 1-year return | +9.0% | −7.4% |
| 30-day volatility | 8.2% | 5.1% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −7.6% | −8.3% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 2.45% | 7.75% |
| Holdings | 29 | 45 |
| Top 10 weight | 66.0% | 71.6% |
| Look-through P/E | — | 12.1 |
| Holdings vs fair value | — | +10.2% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | — | 100% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$1.1M thru Jun 2026 | +$2.5M thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Oct 1, 2026third-party data | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
12% of NDAA · 20% of THRV
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | NDAA | THRV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 0.0% | 2.4% | −2.4% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 0.8% | −0.8% |
More: full overlap table · NDAA holdings · THRV holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.