NYM vs PCQ

AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF against Pimco California Municipal Income Fund: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
—
same fee
1-year return gap
—
Larger fund
NYM
$1.3B

Side by side

NYMPCQ
FundAB New York Intermediate Municipal ETFPimco California Municipal Income Fund
IssuerAllianceBernsteinPIMCO
CategoryState MuniState Muni
Expense ratio0.27%—
Assets$1.3B$440M
Average daily dollar volume$2.8M$2.3M
ListedJan 9, 1989Jun 27, 2001
FrenzyCap score6552
1-month return−0.2%−3.8%
3-month return−2.0%−8.6%
Year to date−2.8%−10.2%
1-year return—−11.4%
30-day volatility4.3%18.9%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−5.5%−17.3%
Trailing 12-month yield2.77%—
Holdings408—
Top 10 weight15.1%—
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months−$1.3M thru May 2026—
30-day implied volatility——
Holdings as ofas of May 31, 2026SEC filing

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · NYM holdings · PCQ holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.