ROSC vs SQLV
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF against Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.
Overlap by weight
25%
108 shared positions
Fee gap
26 bp
ROSC is cheaper
1-year return gap
1.1 pts
SQLV is ahead
Larger fund
ROSC
$49M
Side by side
| ROSC | SQLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF |
| Issuer | Hartford | Royce |
| Category | Multi-Factor | Quality |
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 0.60% |
| Assets | $49M | $39M |
| Average daily dollar volume | $459K | $336K |
| Listed | Mar 23, 2015 | Jul 12, 2017 |
| FrenzyCap score | 51 | 36 |
| 1-month return | −0.4% | −1.8% |
| 3-month return | −2.4% | −1.8% |
| Year to date | +15.5% | +19.9% |
| 1-year return | +20.5% | +21.6% |
| 30-day volatility | 8.8% | 10.9% |
| Worst drawdown, 1 year | −7.8% | −7.9% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 1.96% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 310 | 322 |
| Top 10 weight | 10.3% | 7.1% |
| Look-through P/E | 23.7 | 26.0 |
| Holdings vs fair value | +20.8% | +27.1% |
| Holdings above 200-day average | 59% | 53% |
| Net flow, latest 3 reported months | +$2.6M thru Jul 2026 | $0 thru Jun 2026 |
| 30-day implied volatility | — | — |
| Holdings as of | as of Apr 30, 2026SEC filing | as of Jun 30, 2026SEC filing |
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.
Largest shared holdings
43% of ROSC · 34% of SQLV| Holding | ROSC | SQLV |
|---|---|---|
| PHIN | 0.69% | 0.56% |
| PRDO | 0.88% | 0.48% |
| CALM | 0.74% | 0.47% |
| CPRX | 1.08% | 0.47% |
| BKE | 0.88% | 0.47% |
| INVA | 0.55% | 0.47% |
| PFBC | 0.47% | 0.51% |
| FHI | 0.46% | 0.72% |
| WU | 0.61% | 0.42% |
| EMBC | 0.41% | 0.49% |
| Fresh Del Monte Produce Inc | 0.40% | 0.49% |
| SUPN | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| RUSHA | 0.88% | 0.38% |
| CNXN | 0.52% | 0.38% |
| HRMY | 0.98% | 0.36% |
| HNI | 0.78% | 0.35% |
| PLAB | 0.35% | 0.37% |
| TDC | 0.68% | 0.34% |
| STRA | 0.39% | 0.33% |
| MD | 1.02% | 0.33% |
| EBF | 0.62% | 0.33% |
| RMR | 0.34% | 0.33% |
| THFF | 0.32% | 0.54% |
| HAE | 0.64% | 0.32% |
| LZB | 0.49% | 0.32% |
Sector mix of the stock holdings
| Sector | ROSC | SQLV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 18.6% | 16.7% | +1.8% |
| Financials | 15.7% | 18.2% | −2.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 17.0% | 14.3% | +2.8% |
| Industrials | 12.4% | 17.2% | −4.9% |
| Technology | 9.8% | 14.9% | −5.0% |
| Communication Services | 3.9% | 4.7% | −0.7% |
| Materials | 3.3% | 4.7% | −1.4% |
| Consumer Staples | 3.4% | 2.5% | +0.9% |
| Energy | 3.1% | 2.6% | +0.5% |
| Real Estate | 4.9% | 0.6% | +4.3% |
| Utilities | 1.5% | 0.6% | +1.0% |
| Other | 0.0% | 0.2% | −0.2% |
More: full overlap table · ROSC holdings · SQLV holdings
Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.