RWM vs SPXU

ProShares Short Russell2000 against ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Overlap by weight
0%
0 shared positions
Fee gap
6 bp
SPXU is cheaper
1-year return gap
25.1 pts
RWM is ahead
Larger fund
SPXU
$436M

Side by side

RWMSPXU
FundProShares Short Russell2000ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500
IssuerProSharesProShares
CategoryInverse EquityInverse Equity
Expense ratio0.95%0.89%
Assets$165M$436M
Average daily dollar volume$621M$301M
ListedJan 23, 2007Jun 23, 2009
FrenzyCap score6876
1-month return+3.6%−0.2%
3-month return+5.8%−12.9%
Year to date−11.4%−32.4%
1-year return−11.4%−36.5%
30-day volatility13.3%29.6%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−26.0%−47.3%
Trailing 12-month yield3.29%6.49%
Holdings1118
Top 10 weight5.5%50.8%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$9.1M thru May 2026+$126M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility41.4%38.4%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

Largest shared holdings

0% of RWM · 0% of SPXU

No holdings in common.

Sector mix of the stock holdings

No sector breakdown: these funds hold few classified stocks.

More: full overlap table · RWM holdings · SPXU holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.