SPXU vs TWM

ProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500 against ProShares UltraShort Russell2000: cost, size, returns, what they hold and how much of it is the same.

Fee gap
6 bp
SPXU is cheaper
1-year return gap
12.7 pts
TWM is ahead
Larger fund
SPXU
$436M

Side by side

SPXUTWM
FundProShares UltraPro Short S&P 500ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
IssuerProSharesProShares
CategoryInverse EquityInverse Equity
Expense ratio0.89%0.95%
Assets$436M$61M
Average daily dollar volume$301M$22M
ListedJun 23, 2009Jan 23, 2007
FrenzyCap score7657
1-month return−0.2%+7.4%
3-month return−12.9%+11.3%
Year to date−32.4%−23.6%
1-year return−36.5%−23.8%
30-day volatility29.6%26.7%
Worst drawdown, 1 year−47.3%−46.3%
Trailing 12-month yield6.49%3.80%
Holdings1810
Top 10 weight50.8%0.0%
Look-through P/E——
Holdings vs fair value——
Holdings above 200-day average——
Net flow, latest 3 reported months+$126M thru May 2026+$7.3M thru May 2026
30-day implied volatility38.4%38.3%
Holdings as ofas of Oct 21, 2026issuer dataas of Oct 21, 2026issuer data

Returns are price returns and exclude distributions. Flows are each fund's own latest reported months and may not cover the same period.

More: full overlap table · SPXU holdings · TWM holdings

Fund data comes from each fund's SEC filings and issuer disclosures and is shown with the date it is as of. SEC portfolio and flow filings become public about 60 days after the period they cover. Nothing here is investment advice; see Terms.