CEPV Cantor Equity Partners V, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
- Industry (SIC)
- BLANK CHECKS (6770)
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.3B
- List Date
- 2025-11-04
- CIK
- 0002034266
- Next Earnings
- 2026-11-13
- Headquarters
- New York, NY
Cantor Equity Partners V Inc is a blank check company.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
| Month | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -0.29% | -0.29% |
| Feb | -- | -0.98% | -0.98% |
| Mar | -- | -0.39% | -0.39% |
| Apr | -- | 1.19% | 1.19% |
| May | -- | 1.08% | 1.08% |
| Jun | -- | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| Jul | -- | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| Aug | -- | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| Sep | -- | -0.77% | -0.77% |
| Oct | -- | -0.97%* | -0.97% |
| Nov | -0.53% | -- | -0.53% |
| Dec | 0.29% | -- | 0.29% |
| Total | -0.24% | -0.36% | -0.30% |
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
Momentum Oscillators
Volume & Volatility
Data Summary
LLM Stock Analysis Report: CEPV
Executive Summary
Overall Assessment: NEUTRAL (6/10)
Key Drivers and Primary Risks:
- Technical indicators suggest a range-bound market with no clear direction
- Low volatility indicates reduced risk, but also limited potential for significant price moves
- No recent news headlines available to influence sentiment
Investment Thesis: CEPV's neutral technical picture and low volatility make it an attractive play for traders seeking to capitalize on the stock's relatively stable price action. However, the lack of earnings data and options activity limits our ability to assess potential catalysts or risks.
Recent News Sentiment Impact: No recent news headlines available, so no impact assessment can be made.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction:
- Short-term (1-4 weeks): NEUTRAL
- Medium-term (1-3 months): BEARISH TREND
- Long-term (3-12 months): UPTREND POTENTIAL
Support/Resistance Levels:
- Key price levels from moving averages:
- SMA 20: $10.24
- EMA 12: $10.25
- Technical patterns:
- Upper Bollinger Band: $10.29
- Lower Bollinger Band: $10.18
Momentum Signals:
- RSI (14): 67.03 (neutral)
- MACD: Bullish momentum with a histogram of 0.03
- Bollinger Bands: Neutral signal, with price touching the middle band
Volume Analysis:
- Volume SMA 20: 28745.20
- On-Balance Volume (OBV): 7306361.00
- Volume Rate of Change: -64.92% (indicating a decline in volume)
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: No recent news headlines available.
Sentiment Assessment: NEUTRAL
Catalyst Identification: No earnings data or options activity available to identify potential catalysts.
Market Narrative: The lack of recent news and low volatility suggest a stable market, but the absence of significant price movements limits our ability to assess sentiment.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Beta Interpretation: 0.03 (low risk relative to SPY)
Volatility Regime: Low volatility regime with reduced potential for significant price moves.
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels: + SMA 20: $10.24 + EMA 12: $10.25
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: No sector performance data available.
Institutional Activity: No institutional activity data available.
Correlation Analysis: Correlation with SPY: 0.09 (indicating a low correlation)
Relative Valuation: CEPV's price action is relatively stable, but its position within the trading range is unclear without recent news or earnings data.
Key Levels & Action Items
- Critical Price Levels:
- Support: SMA 20 ($10.24), EMA 12 ($10.25)
- Resistance: Upper Bollinger Band ($10.29)
- Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None identified
- Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No earnings dates or regulatory events available.
- Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations are crucial in a range-bound market with low volatility.
Please note that this analysis is based on the provided data, which may not be comprehensive. It is essential to consider additional information and context when making investment decisions.
CEPV Options Activity & IV Rank
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
Risk Metrics
Analysis Details
Data Points: 198
Period: 252 trading days
Low volatility - stock moves less than market
| Investor | Value | Share of their portfolio | Rank | Q/Q shares | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium Management Hedge fund Izzy Englander | $2.5M | #2465 of 3716 | -29.9% | 13F | |
| Soros Fund Management Family office George Soros, Robert Soros, Jonathan Soros | $1.0M | #212 of 251 | 0.0% | 13F | |
| Citadel Hedge fund Ken Griffin | $128K | #5681 of 6285 | new | 13F |
Hedge funds, activists, holding companies and family offices we track, from their latest 13F (quarter-end value) and Form 4 filings in the last 3 years. Family offices · all institutions
CEPV Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-09-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
CEPV Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2025-11-05| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-05 | Brandon Lutnick | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +2,160,000 | $10.00 | $21.60M | EDGAR |
CEPV Insider Holdings
1 insider · @ $10.19| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brandon Lutnick | Chief Executive Officer | 540,000 | $5.50M | $21.60M | 1 | 2025-11-05 |
CEPV Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Oct 15, 2026Directors 5
- Brandon Lutnick · since Nov 3, 2025
- Danny Salinas · since Nov 3, 2025
- Mukesh Prasad · since Nov 3, 2025
- Charlotte Blechman · since Mar 10, 2026
- Robert Hochberg · since Oct 14, 2026
Officers 2
- Brandon Lutnick · Chief Executive Officer · since Nov 3, 2025
- Jane Novak · Chief Financial Officer · since Nov 3, 2025
10% owners 4
- Brandon Lutnick · since Nov 3, 2025
- Cantor EP Holdings V, LLC (entity) · since Nov 3, 2025
- Cf Group Management Inc (entity) · since Nov 3, 2025
- L. P. Cantor Fitzgerald · since Nov 3, 2025
Changes in the last 10 years (11)
| Oct 14, 2026 | Robert Hochberg became a director |
| Mar 10, 2026 | Charlotte Blechman became a director |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Mukesh Prasad became a director |
| Nov 3, 2025 | L. P. Cantor Fitzgerald became a 10% owner |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Jane Novak became Chief Financial Officer |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Danny Salinas became a director |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Cf Group Management Inc became a 10% owner |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Cantor EP Holdings V, LLC became a 10% owner |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Brandon Lutnick became a director |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Brandon Lutnick became a 10% owner |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Brandon Lutnick became Chief Executive Officer |
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.