Eastman Chemical Company(EMN)
Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership.
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
Snapshot
$72.28
- 52-Week Range
- $56.11 – $83.47
- YTD
- +12.34%
- IV Rank (30D)
- 4.42
- Straddle Price
- $6.27
- P/C Vol Ratio
- 0.18
- Market Cap
- $8.2B
Fair Value
+10.7% vs price
A blended fair-value estimate combining up to six valuation methods. Each method is weighted by how well it fits the company — DCF down-weights for unprofitable names; DDM only fires for steady dividend payers; comparables down-weight when peer multiples disagree.
- DCF (quality-aware) — projects free cash flow with a horizon that scales to business quality. True compounders (quality 6/6) get 10 years explicit + 10 years fade before terminal; cyclical/struggling names (quality 0-1) get a 5-year terminal cliff. Quality is scored from ROE, gross margin, growth, FCF margin, debt load, and FCF consistency — the same factors that drive market premium for compounders.
- Market-Implied Growth (in Model Inputs) — reverse-DCF that answers "what growth rate is the market pricing in?". Lets you sanity-check the deviation: if implied growth is plausible for the business, the model's bearish flag may be wrong; if implausible, the market may be over-extrapolating.
- DDM (Gordon Growth Dividend Model) — values the stream of future dividends. Only used when trailing yield ≥ 0.5% and dividend payments are stable.
- P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/B, P/S — applies the peer-group median multiple to this company's per-share metric. Peers come from the same set as the "Related symbols" card. Earnings/sales metrics are forward-tilted by the company's recent revenue growth (capped at 25%) so they're comparable to peers' growth-embedded multiples — mimics how analysts use NTM rather than TTM. Per-multiple weights are biased by company quality (e.g. P/B down-weighted for asset-light tech).
- Market Anchor (SMA50) — the 50-day moving average, weighted by recent trading-range stability (tighter Bollinger bands → higher weight). Captures information fundamentals miss (forward consensus, sentiment, supply/demand) — but only when recent trading is steady enough that the market has converged on a view. During wild breakouts or breakdowns the anchor's weight collapses.
- Options Expected (B-L 30d) — the risk-neutral expected stock price at 30-day options expiration, derived from the full implied-volatility surface via Breeden-Litzenberger (second derivative of call price wrt strike → implied PDF, then E[S_T]). Forward-looking, captures all options-implied information (smile, skew, term structure) in one number. Weighted by chain liquidity. SP500-only at present (pre-computed daily). Backtest evidence: adds modest alpha across most bucket × holding combos.
- Blended value — weighted average. Confidence reflects how many methods fired and how tight peer dispersion is.
- Deviation pill — green when blended FV ≥ 10% above current price (undervalued); red when ≥ 10% below; grey otherwise.
| 10-yr Treasury (rf) | 4.47% |
| Beta vs SPY | 1.00 |
| Cost of Equity (CAPM) | 9.97% (VRP-adj) |
| WACC | 8.37% |
| Volatility Risk Premium | +25.0pp (IV − HV30), ERP adj +50bps |
| Effective Tax Rate | 11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY, DCF input) | -4.8% |
| DCF Horizon | 5 years explicit + fade |
| Free Cash Flow (TTM) | $0.5B |
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 6.6% |
| Book / Price | 73.0% — banking bias active (P/B is primary) |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 19.8% |
| FCF Margin (TTM) | 5.8% |
| Debt / Equity | 0.73 |
| Quality Score | 0/6 — cyclical/struggling (5y DCF) |
| Market-Implied Growth | +10.3% (reverse-DCF on current price) |
| SMA 50 | $73.52 (Market Anchor value) |
| SMA 20 / Bollinger Mid | $73.84 |
| Bollinger Width / SMA20 | 13.0% (drives anchor stability) |
| Net Debt | $3.8B |
| Market Cap | $8B |
Peers used for multiples: BCPC, CE, ESI, FUL, HCC, SXT
(filtered from 8 ETF-co-members; sector bias active)
Blended Fair Value
$79.92
Current Price
$72.18
Deviation
+10.7%
Forward-Return Rank
LONG
gates ✓
?
| Horizon | Expected α | z Pred | Blended z | Rank % | Active? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21d | -1.6% ⚠ | +0.43 | +0.17 | 39.9% | — |
| 42d | -2.4% ⚠ | +0.56 | +0.24 | 43.1% | — |
| 63d | -3.5% ⚠ | +0.47 | +0.19 | 35.4% | — |
Expected α = forward-return point estimate vs SPY (e.g., +7.5% means the predictor expects this stock to outperform SPY by 7.5% over that horizon).
For SHORT direction the model uses a different ranking metric (conviction-weighted deviation, not the LGBM prediction); Expected α is shown for reference.
⚠ flags rows where Expected α disagrees with the FV direction — two independent signals are in conflict; conviction is low even if rank looks extreme.
Forward-Return Rank. A proprietary ensemble of a machine-learning forward-return model and a conviction-weighted fundamental score, ranked cross-sectionally each day across the S&P 500 (and broader universes on the screener). Each stock is scored at three horizons (21/42/63 trading days). "Active" = top/bottom 5% AND all risk filters pass. Backtested mean alpha vs SPY on active picks: 21d LONG +13.4%, 63d +34.9% (S&P 500, walk-forward). Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Value vs momentum conflict ⚠. The "FV direction" (long/short) comes from the fundamentals-based engine — price vs intrinsic value. The "Expected α" comes from a separate machine-learning predictor trained on ~12 features (sector, options-implied move, beta, institutional flow, etc.). Sometimes the two disagree: a stock is overvalued by fundamentals but the predictor expects it to keep outperforming (sector or momentum tailwinds). When all 3 horizons disagree, treat the direction signal as low-conviction — neither model is strongly recommending a position.
| Method | Implied Price | Weight | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCF | $21.42 | 21% | |
| DDM (Gordon) | $21.58 | 17% | |
| Peer P/E | $115.13 | 6% | median 33.4× · 5 peers |
| Peer EV/EBITDA | $196.79 | 6% | median 19.5× · 5 peers |
| Peer P/B | $161.70 | 6% | median 3.1× · 6 peers |
| Peer P/S | $232.89 | 6% | median 3.1× · 6 peers |
| Market Anchor (SMA50) | $73.52 | 36% | stability 85% (BB-width) |
| Options Expected (B-L 30d) | n/a | 0% |
As of 2026-06-18 · updated 2026-06-18 19:23:31.971000
Info
- Industry (SIC)
- PLASTIC MATERIALS, SYNTH RESINS & NONVULCAN ELASTOMERS (2821)
- Exchange
- XNYS
- Market Cap
- $8.2B
Established in 1920 to produce chemicals for Eastman Kodak, Eastman Chemical has grown into a global specialty chemical company with manufacturing sites around the world. The company generates the majority of its sales outside of the United States, with a strong presence in Asian markets. During the past several years, Eastman has sold noncore businesses, choosing to focus on higher-margin specialty product offerings.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | Avg Return | Years of Data |
|---|---|---|
| Jan | +0.45% | 23 |
| Feb | +1.88% | 23 |
| Mar | +1.02% | 23 |
| Apr | +4.59% | 23 |
| May | +0.59% | 23 |
| Jun | -2.29% | 23 |
| Jul | +1.66% | 22 |
| Aug | -1.35% | 22 |
| Sep | -1.34% | 23 |
| Oct | +0.89% | 23 |
| Nov | +3.42% | 23 |
| Dec | -0.02% | 23 |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $73.92
SMA 50: $73.48
SMA 200: $68.50
Current: $72.19
EMA 12: $73.26
EMA 26: $73.42
MACD: -0.1602 | Signal: -0.1522
BEARISH
ADX (14): 10.66
RANGE
+DI: 22.41
−DI: 24.83
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 45.86
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 24.81
Stoch %D: 41.69
Williams %R: -80.80
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $77.24
BB Lower: $70.60
NEUTRAL
OBV: -65,610,045
Vol SMA 20: 1,077,750
Vol ROC: -65.48%
ATR: $2.25
True Range: $1.48
HV 20: 30.6%
HV 30: 31.6%
HV 60: 31.9%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated: 2026-06-18T19:20:15.537000
Date Range: 2024-06-20T00:00:00 – 2026-06-17T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Choose Frenzy-Fast™ for quick analysis or Frenzy-Pro™ for comprehensive analysis.
Analysis includes technical indicators, news sentiment, risk assessment, and specific price levels to watch.
News
Earnings History
7 of 8 under expected move
| Earnings Date | Timing | Expected Move | Actual Move | Ratio | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | After-Close | 6.07% | 3.70% | 0.61x | Within |
| 2024-10-31 | After-Close | 5.90% | 3.82% | 0.65x | Within |
| 2025-01-30 | After-Close | 5.58% | 3.30% | 0.59x | Within |
| 2025-04-24 | After-Close | 8.32% | 5.62% | 0.68x | Within |
| 2025-07-31 | After-Close | 6.82% | 18.52% | 2.72x | Exceeded |
| 2025-11-03 | After-Close | 10.41% | 3.64% | 0.35x | Within |
| 2026-01-29 | After-Close | 8.92% | 0.15% | 0.02x | Within |
| 2026-04-30 | After-Close | 8.65% | 6.07% | 0.70x | Within |
Options Activity
- IV Rank (30D)
- 4.42
- IV Rank (7D)
- 100
- Avg IV
- 52.8%
- Straddle (30D)
- $6.27
- Straddle (7D)
- $2.60
- P/C Volume
- 0.18
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
- Beta (1Y vs SPY)
- 1.19
- Correlation (SPY)
- 38.1%
- R²
- 0.15
- Ann. Volatility
- 38.9%
- SPY Volatility
- 12.4%
Above average volatility - stock moves with market amplification
Beta & Alpha Over Time
Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-03-31
? 13F Guide
Diluted shares outstanding: 115,550,000 (as of 2026-03-31)
Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
8 filers$42.27M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $21.00M | 49.67% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $11.67M | 27.61% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $3.16M | 7.47% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | PEAK6 LLC | $3.13M | 7.40% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $1.66M | 3.93% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | Walleye Capital LLC | $1.48M | 3.50% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Walleye Trading LLC | $175.54K | 0.42% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Orion Porfolio Solutions, LLC | $76 | <0.01% | 2026-03-31 |
12 filers$31.43M notional
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUSQUEHANNA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, LLP Custodian | $14.21M | 45.22% | 2026-03-31 |
| 2 | Polymer Capital Management (US) LLC | $5.34M | 17.00% | 2026-03-31 |
| 3 | D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. Custodian | $3.72M | 11.83% | 2026-03-31 |
| 4 | CITADEL ADVISORS LLC Custodian | $2.53M | 8.06% | 2026-03-31 |
| 5 | WOLVERINE TRADING, LLC Custodian | $2.40M | 7.64% | 2025-09-30 |
| 6 | JANE STREET GROUP, LLC Custodian | $969.26K | 3.08% | 2026-03-31 |
| 7 | Walleye Capital LLC | $778.46K | 2.48% | 2026-03-31 |
| 8 | Walleye Trading LLC | $488.45K | 1.55% | 2026-03-31 |
| 9 | CREDIT INDUSTRIEL ET COMMERCIAL | $267.12K | 0.85% | 2026-03-31 |
| 10 | Groupe la Francaise | $267.12K | 0.85% | 2026-03-31 |
| 11 | MILLENNIUM MANAGEMENT LLC Custodian | $236.59K | 0.75% | 2026-03-31 |
| 12 | UBS Group AG Custodian | $217.51K | 0.69% | 2026-03-31 |
Insider Activity
Latest: 2026-06-03
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 | Adrian James Holt | SVP, Chf HR Ofcr | Mixed | +3,283 | $75.49 | -$79.9K | EDGAR |
| 2026-05-11 | Damon J Audia | Director | Grant (A) | +1,628 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | Linnie M Haynesworth | Director | Award (A) | +1,628 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | ERIC L BUTLER | Director | Award (A) | +1,628 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | JAMES J /KY OBRIEN | Director | Award (A) | +1,628 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | RENEE J HORNBAKER | Director | Award (A) | +1,628 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | Julie Fasone Holder | Director | Award (A) | +1,628 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | DONALD W SLAGER | Director | Award (A) | +1,628 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | Kim Ann Mink | Director | Grant (A) | +1,628 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | BRETT D BEGEMANN | Director | Grant (A) | +1,628 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-11 | Humberto P Alfonso | Director | Grant (A) | +1,628 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-05-07 | Adrian James Holt | SVP, Chf HR Ofcr | Sell (S) | −1,709 | $77.05 | -$131.7K | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-10 | Kim Ann Mink | Director | Grant (A) | +408 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-10 | RENEE J HORNBAKER | Director | Grant (A) | +408 RSU | — | EDGAR | |
| 2026-04-10 | DONALD W SLAGER | Director | Grant (A) | +408 RSU | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
Insider Holdings
51 insiders · @ $72.19
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAMES P ROGERS | Exec Chrmn of Board | 550,026 | $39.70M | -$12.07M | 22 | 2014-02-27 |
| 2 | Mark J Costa | CEO & Board Chair | 501,156 | $36.18M | -$68.61M | 62 | 2026-02-26 |
| 3 | BRAD A LICH | EVP & CCO | 99,374 | $7.17M | -$15.90M | 39 | 2026-02-26 |
| 4 | Ronald Carter Lindsay | Chief Operating Officer | 95,603 | $6.90M | -$17.92M | 32 | 2016-03-01 |
| 5 | J BRIAN FERGUSON | Exec Chairman of the Board | 83,217 | $6.01M | -$47.52M | 17 | 2010-11-22 |
| 6 | THERESA K LEE | SVP, Chief Legal & Admin Ofcr | 72,946 | $5.27M | -$12.58M | 23 | 2012-02-22 |
| 7 | STEPHEN GLENN CRAWFORD | EVP, Chief Tech and Sust. Ofc. | 68,173 | $4.92M | -$7.32M | 44 | 2026-02-20 |
| 8 | William Thomas Jr. McLain | EVP, CFO | 65,313 | $4.71M | $54.0K | 16 | 2026-02-26 |
| 9 | CURTIS E ESPELAND | EVP | 56,797 | $4.10M | -$16.69M | 43 | 2020-03-02 |
| 10 | Perry Stuckey | SVP, Chf HR Ofcr | 49,326 | $3.56M | -$6.20M | 28 | 2022-03-01 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
Recent SEC Filings
Latest: 2026-05-12
Current reports — material events the company must disclose within 4 business days (earnings releases, M&A, executive changes, etc.).
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 0000915389-26-000123 | EDGAR |
| 2026-04-30 | 0000915389-26-000094 | EDGAR |
| 2026-02-20 | 0001193125-26-061351 | EDGAR |
| 2026-01-29 | 0000915389-26-000006 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-03 | 0000915389-25-000176 | EDGAR |
| 2025-10-09 | 0000915389-25-000160 | EDGAR |
| 2025-07-31 | 0000915389-25-000152 | EDGAR |
| 2025-06-27 | 0000915389-25-000136 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-06 | 0000915389-25-000129 | EDGAR |
| 2025-05-05 | 0000915389-25-000126 | EDGAR |
Annual report — audited financial statements, MD&A, risk factors. Filed 60–90 days after fiscal year-end.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-13 | 0000915389-26-000013 | EDGAR |
| 2025-02-14 | 0000915389-25-000012 | EDGAR |
| 2024-02-14 | 0000915389-24-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2023-02-15 | 0000915389-23-000015 | EDGAR |
| 2022-02-25 | 0000915389-22-000010 | EDGAR |
| 2021-02-22 | 0000915389-21-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2020-02-26 | 0000915389-20-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2019-02-27 | 0000915389-19-000009 | EDGAR |
| 2018-03-01 | 0000915389-18-000016 | EDGAR |
| 2017-02-27 | 0000915389-17-000014 | EDGAR |
Quarterly report — unaudited financials and MD&A. Filed 40–45 days after each of the first three fiscal quarters.
| Filing Date | Accession | Link |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-01 | 0000915389-26-000099 | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-04 | 0000915389-25-000183 | EDGAR |
| 2025-08-01 | 0000915389-25-000155 | EDGAR |
| 2025-04-25 | 0000915389-25-000105 | EDGAR |
| 2024-11-01 | 0000915389-24-000227 | EDGAR |
| 2024-07-26 | 0000915389-24-000192 | EDGAR |
| 2024-04-26 | 0000915389-24-000133 | EDGAR |
| 2023-10-27 | 0000915389-23-000170 | EDGAR |
| 2023-07-28 | 0000915389-23-000136 | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-28 | 0000915389-23-000091 | EDGAR |
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.
| P/E Ratio | 21.0 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.4 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.0 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5 |
| TTM Revenue | $8.6B |
| TTM Net Income | $0.4B |
| TTM EPS | $3.45 |
| ROE | 6.6% |
| Dividend Yield | 4.55% |
| Debt/Equity | 0.87 |