GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·4d ago
IPW iPower, Inc. Common Stock
XNASStock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading
Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.
IPW
—
—
Key stats
Related
About
- Industry (SIC)
- RETAIL-BUILDING MATERIALS, HARDWARE, GARDEN SUPPLY (5200) · industry map
- Exchange
- XNAS
- Market Cap
- $0.0B
- Employees
- 4
- List Date
- 2021-05-12
- CIK
- 0001830072
- Headquarters
- Rancho Cucamonga, CA
- Homepage
- https://www.meetipower.com
iPower Inc is a technology-enabled commerce infrastructure company providing supply chain, logistics, fulfillment, warehousing and procurement solutions for e-commerce and distribution channels. Its product portfolio includes hydroponic products, gardening supplies, home goods and related accessories, with gardening and home products. Geographically, the company generates majority of its revenue from the United States, followed by Canada and other international markets.
Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.
Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.
Chart
Seasonality
| Month | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | -- | -17.72% | 156.24% | 20.93% | -15.56% | -42.82% | 20.21% |
| Feb | -- | -19.79% | -20.97% | 39.86% | -13.77% | -51.64% | -13.26% |
| Mar | -- | 5.66% | -26.07% | -26.36% | -15.68% | -33.01% | -19.09% |
| Apr | -- | -18.35% | -15.62% | 3.53% | 12.40% | -38.88% | -11.38% |
| May | 14.63% | -7.75% | 27.98% | 308.77% | -10.80% | -47.58% | 47.54% |
| Jun | 15.45% | -5.22% | 61.76% | -25.45% | 40.88% | -47.93% | 6.58% |
| Jul | -22.96% | -4.07% | -30.07% | -12.86% | 0.52% | -76.22% | -24.28% |
| Aug | 1.58% | -15.57% | -13.53% | -20.37% | -21.57% | -59.06% | -21.42% |
| Sep | -18.18% | -34.23% | 3.39% | 43.65% | 2.07% | -35.91% | -6.53% |
| Oct | -13.01% | -11.77% | -31.89% | -32.52% | -23.90% | -78.88%* | -32.00% |
| Nov | -10.03% | -21.39% | 28.72% | -42.66% | -7.47% | -- | -10.57% |
| Dec | -13.45% | -18.37% | -26.19% | 2.81% | -28.15% | -- | -16.67% |
| Total | -42.60% | -84.99% | 5.80% | 55.81% | -64.69% | -99.96% | -38.44% |
Technical Indicators
Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.
Trend Indicators
- SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
- EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
- MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
- ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
- +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
- RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
- Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
- Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.
Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.
Volume & Volatility
- Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
- OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
- Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
- ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
- HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.
Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →
Trend Indicators
SMA 20: $8.11
SMA 50: $17.42
SMA 200: $1007.22
Current: $2.89
EMA 12: $5.21
EMA 26: $10.86
MACD: -5.6460 | Signal: 0.5681
BEARISH
ADX (14): 7.75
RANGE
+DI: 27.18
−DI: 29.25
Momentum Oscillators
RSI (14): 19.81
OVERSOLD
Stoch %K: 3.26
Stoch %D: 2.51
Williams %R: -95.62
Volume & Volatility
BB Upper: $17.17
BB Lower: $-0.94
NEUTRAL
OBV: -10,137,973
Vol SMA 20: 712,267
Vol ROC: -86.94%
ATR: $2.45
True Range: $0.95
HV 20: 192.6%
HV 30: 223.8%
HV 60: 193.8%
Data Summary
Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2024-10-28T00:00:00 – 2026-10-26T00:00:00
AI Analysis
Here is my comprehensive stock analysis report for IPW:
Executive Summary
Overall assessment: BEARISH with confidence level 6/10 Key drivers and primary risks: * High volatility driven by beta of 10.24, indicating a high-risk profile * Recent news headlines highlighting debt repayment may not be enough to sustain the current price levels Investment thesis: IPW is a high-risk stock that requires careful risk management. The recent news on debt repayment has boosted investor sentiment, but the stock's high volatility and beta make it susceptible to significant price swings. Recent news sentiment impact: Positive news headline (iPower issues $2 million in promissory notes) may have contributed to the recent uptrend.
Technical Analysis
Trend Direction: * Short-term: NEUTRAL (no clear trend) * Medium-term: BEARISH (price below SMA 50 and EMA 12) * Long-term: BEARISH (price below all moving averages)
Support/Resistance Levels: * Resistance: $11.59 (upper Bollinger Band), $10.41 (current price) * Support: $8.50 (lower Bollinger Band), $6.37 (SMA 50)
Momentum Signals: * RSI (14): 55.51, indicating NEUTRAL momentum * MACD: Bullish signal line crossover above the histogram * Bollinger Bands: Neutral, no clear squeeze or breakout
Volume Analysis: * Volume SMA 20: 26123.70, indicating moderate volume * On-Balance Volume (OBV): 59706791.00, with a slight uptrend * Volume Rate of Change: -83.45%, suggesting a decrease in trading activity
News & Sentiment Analysis
Recent Headlines Summary: The recent news headline highlighting debt repayment may have boosted investor sentiment and contributed to the current price levels.
Sentiment Assessment: Aggregate news sentiment is POSITIVE, with a single positive news article driving the sentiment.
Catalyst Identification: No upcoming earnings dates or product launches mentioned.
Market Narrative: The positive news headline aligns with the recent uptrend in IPW's price, but the high volatility and beta suggest that this trend may be short-lived.
Risk & Volatility Assessment
Risk Assessment: * Beta: 10.24 (high risk) * Stock Volatility: 32.53% (high volatility)
Options Market Signals: No options data available.
Downside Protection: Support levels at $8.50 and $6.37 may provide some downside protection, but the high volatility makes it challenging to predict price movements.
Market Context & Positioning
Sector Performance: IPW's performance is relatively weak compared to its sector.
Institutional Activity: No clear institutional activity patterns suggested by volume trends.
Correlation Analysis: The stock has a low correlation with the market (R-squared = 0.06), indicating that it may move independently of broader market trends.
Relative Valuation: IPW's price is within its trading range, but the high volatility and beta suggest that this range may be narrowing or expanding soon.
Key Levels & Action Items
Critical Price Levels: Resistance: $11.59 (upper Bollinger Band), $10.41 (current price) Support: $8.50 (lower Bollinger Band), $6.37 (SMA 50)
Breakout/Breakdown Levels: No clear breakout or breakdown levels mentioned.
Time-Sensitive Catalysts: No upcoming earnings dates, product launches, or regulatory changes mentioned.
Risk Management: Stop-loss levels at $8.50 and $6.37 may provide some risk management considerations, but the high volatility makes it challenging to predict price movements.
Overall, IPW presents a high-risk profile driven by its beta of 10.24 and high volatility. While the recent news headline on debt repayment has boosted investor sentiment, the stock's technical indicators suggest a bearish trend. Investors should exercise caution when considering this stock and prioritize risk management strategies.
Generated
News
All IPW news →
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·2mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·5mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·28mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·28mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·28mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·28mo ago
Zacks Investment ResearchT3·29mo ago
GlobeNewswire Inc.T3·29mo ago
Showing 1–10 of 50
Page 1 of 5
IPW Options Activity & IV Rank
Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →
Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)
score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.
Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)
RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.
Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
- RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
- MACD crossover + histogram trend
- Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
- Stochastic %K <20 / >80
- Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
- Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
- Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
- BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
- IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
- IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
- Min open interest across all legs
- OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05
score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →
Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.
Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.
Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol pointsHow much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.
- Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
- Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
- Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
- Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each sideWhich side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.
- Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
- Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
- Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
- Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together
Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:
- High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
- Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
- Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d
—
—
pts
EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
Extreme reading.
Historically these have been contrarian — on the small set of observed earnings-day cases, large negative wing-vs-ATM gaps (calls pricing much richer than puts at the same delta) preceded sharp drops in the underlying within 1-12 days. Not financial advice and the dataset is small.
Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.
Volatility Surface
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.
Volatility Smile
Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.
IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Risk Metrics
Beta: 2.2023
Alpha: -776.86%
Correlation: 0.1940
R-Squared: 3.8%
Stock Volatility: 144.7%
Market Volatility: 12.7%
Analysis Details
Benchmark: SPY
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Data Points: 251
Period: 252 trading days
Interpretation:
High volatility - stock moves more than market
High volatility - stock moves more than market
Beta & Alpha Over Time
IPW Institutional Ownership (13F)
Latest filings — 2026-06-30Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.
- Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
- Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
- % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
- Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.
Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
| # | Filer | Notional Value | % of Total | Period |
|---|
IPW Insider Trading (Form 4)
Latest: 2026-07-09Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
| Filed | Reporter | Role | Action | Shares | Avg Price | Net $ | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | Mixed | +5,004 | $1.95 | $14.3K | EDGAR |
| 2025-11-13 | Chenlong Tan | CEO & Chairman | Award (A) | +81,136 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-11-27 | Chenlong Tan | CEO & Chairman | Buy (P) | +10,000 | $0.69 | $6.9K | EDGAR |
| 2024-09-03 | Chenlong Tan | Chief Executive Officer | Grant (A) | +1,200,000 opt | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-08-15 | Kevin Liles | Director | Award (A) | +23,809 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-08-13 | Bennet Price Tchaikovsky Jr | Director | Award (A) | +23,809 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-08-13 | Hanxi Li | Director | Award (A) | +23,809 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2024-05-21 | Chenlong Tan | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +20,000 | $1.54 | $30.9K | EDGAR |
| 2023-08-02 | Kevin Liles | Director | Award (A) | +24,800 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-07-27 | Bennet Price Tchaikovsky Jr | Director | Award (A) | +24,800 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2023-06-02 | Kevin Vassily | Chief Financial Officer | Buy (P) | +10,000 | $0.68 | $6.8K | EDGAR |
| 2023-06-02 | Chenlong Tan | Chief Executive Officer | Buy (P) | +20,000 | $0.67 | $13.3K | EDGAR |
| 2023-04-26 | Hanxi Li | Director | Award (A) | +51,724 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-11-10 | Kevin Liles | Director | Award (A) | +24,800 | — | EDGAR | |
| 2022-10-27 | Bennet Price Tchaikovsky Jr | Director | Award (A) | +24,800 | — | EDGAR |
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.
IPW Insider Holdings
2 insiders · @ $2.89
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
| # | Insider | Role | Shares | Disclosed Exposure | Lifetime OM Net | Filings | Last Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HRT FINANCIAL LP | 10%+ Owner | 742 | $2.1K | $14.3K | 1 | 2026-07-09 |
| 2 | Chenlong Tan | CEO & Chairman | 395 | $1.1K | $51.1K | 5 | 2025-11-13 |
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.
IPW Board & Officers
As of SEC filings through Jul 9, 2026Directors 5
- Bennet Price Tchaikovsky Jr · since May 12, 2021
- Chenlong Tan · since May 12, 2021
- Hanxi Li · since Dec 23, 2021
- Yue Guo · since May 8, 2025
- Yi Yang · since Jun 6, 2025
Officers 1
- Chenlong Tan · CEO & Chairman · listed since Nov 2024
10% owners 1
- Chenlong Tan · since May 12, 2021
Changes in the last 10 years (16)
| Jul 9, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP reported in an SEC filing no longer being a 10% owner |
| Jul 6, 2026 | Hrt Financial LP became a 10% owner |
| Jun 6, 2025 | Yi Yang became a director |
| May 8, 2025 | Yue Guo became a director |
| May 8, 2025 | The company announced the departure of Kevin Liles from the board in an SEC filing |
| Nov 27, 2024 | Chenlong Tan listed as CEO & Chairman (previously Chief Executive Officer) in SEC filings |
| Dec 23, 2021 | Hanxi Li became a director |
| Dec 21, 2021 | The company announced the departure of Danilo Cacciamatta from the board in an SEC filing |
| May 12, 2021 | Kevin Vassily became a director |
| May 12, 2021 | Kevin Vassily became Chief Financial Officer |
| May 12, 2021 | Kevin Liles became a director |
| May 12, 2021 | Danilo Cacciamatta became a director |
| May 12, 2021 | Chenlong Tan became a director |
| May 12, 2021 | Chenlong Tan became a 10% owner |
| May 12, 2021 | Chenlong Tan became Chief Executive Officer |
| May 12, 2021 | Bennet Price Tchaikovsky Jr became a director |
Not reported recently (1)
- Kevin Vassily · Last reported as a director in an SEC filing dated May 30, 2024
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
| # | ETF | Provider | Weight | $ Exposure | ETF AUM | As Of |
|---|
Fundamentals
Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.
Metrics
- Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
- Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
- Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
- Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
- Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
- YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
- Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
- Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.
TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.