MINM Minim, Inc. Common Stock

XNAS
Find condors

Stock quote, options chain, IV rank, technicals, AI analysis, and institutional ownership. Iron condor setups Fibonacci levels Insider trading

Market data may be delayed, incomplete, or inaccurate. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Verify quotes with your broker before trading. See Terms §17.

MINM — —
Key stats
About
Industry (SIC)
TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH APPARATUS (3661) · industry map
Exchange
XNAS
Market Cap
$0.0B
Employees
43
List Date
2009-10-06
CIK
0001467761
Headquarters
Tsuen Wan
Homepage
https://www.minim.com

FiEE Inc, formerly Minim Inc is a digital service provider focused on integrating artificial intelligence and data analytics into content creation and brand management. The company offers a range of services designed to support creators, artists, and businesses in developing, managing, and optimizing their digital presence across global platforms, including customized graphic and posts, short videos, and editorial calendars aligned with brand goals.

Summary
—
composite
—
No summary data available for this symbol yet.

Each spoke is this symbol's rank within its sector (0–100; the dotted ring marks the sector median at 50). Higher is more constructive for a long. One spoke — News sentiment — is an absolute reading, not a sector rank. Grayed spokes have no data. A fuller shape is a summary, not a recommendation.

Chart
Seasonality
Insufficient price history — listed 6230 days ago. Seasonality patterns need at least one full year of data.
Technical Indicators

Quick-reference for reading the values below. Indicators combine to confirm a view — no single one is a trade signal on its own.

Trend Indicators
  • SMA 20 / 50 / 200 — price above = uptrend, below = downtrend. SMA 50 crossing SMA 200 is the golden/death cross.
  • EMA 12 / 26 — faster-reacting averages; 12 above 26 is short-term bullish.
  • MACD — bullish when MACD > signal (green badge), bearish when below. Divergence from price often precedes reversals.
  • ADX (14) — trend strength regardless of direction. <20 range, 20–25 weak trend, 25–50 trend, >50 strong trend.
  • +DI / −DI — +DI > −DI favors bulls; the reverse favors bears. Read alongside ADX.
Momentum Oscillators
  • RSI (14) — <30 oversold, >70 overbought. 40–60 is neutral; trending names can stay extreme.
  • Stochastic %K / %D — <20 oversold, >80 overbought. %K crossing %D is an early momentum signal.
  • Williams %R — inverted scale: <−80 oversold, >−20 overbought.

Oscillators work best in range-bound markets; in strong trends they give premature reversal signals.

Volume & Volatility
  • Bollinger Bands — price at upper band = overbought, lower = oversold. Narrow bands (squeeze) often precede expansion.
  • OBV — cumulative volume; rising OBV confirms uptrend, falling OBV confirms downtrend. Divergence from price is a warning.
  • Vol SMA 20 / Vol ROC — today's volume vs. 20-day average. Positive ROC with price move = conviction.
  • ATR / True Range — average daily $ move; sizing and stop-loss reference.
  • HV 20 / 30 / 60 — realized (historical) volatility. Compare to IV on the options cards: IV > HV = rich premium.

Confluence matters: trend + momentum + volume agreeing carries far more weight than any single indicator. For how these feed the spread scanner score, see the algorithm docs →

Trend Indicators

SMA 20: $2.93
SMA 50: $2.43
SMA 200: $1.31
Current: $3.61
EMA 12: $3.06
EMA 26: $2.88
MACD: 0.1880 | Signal: 0.0188
BULLISH
ADX (14): 45.80
STRONG TREND
+DI: 34.11
−DI: 9.42

Momentum Oscillators

RSI (14): 62.15
NEUTRAL
Stoch %K: 69.42
Stoch %D: 65.32
Williams %R: -17.29

Volume & Volatility

BB Upper: $3.48
BB Lower: $2.39
OVERBOUGHT
OBV: 381,492,889
Vol SMA 20: 2,194,174
Vol ROC: 2388.67%
ATR: $0.51
True Range: $0.82
HV 20: 144.8%
HV 30: 306.0%
HV 60: 242.9%

Data Summary

Data Points: 500
Last Updated:
Date Range: 2023-06-23T00:00:00 – 2025-07-09T00:00:00
AI Analysis

LLM Stock Analysis Report: MINM

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: BEARISH (Confidence Level: 6/10)

Key Drivers and Primary Risks:

  • Technical indicators suggest a strong uptrend, but recent price action has been volatile.
  • News sentiment is mostly neutral, with some positive catalysts in the pipeline.

Investment Thesis: MINM's technical momentum and recent news headlines hint at potential further growth. However, the stock's beta and volatility metrics indicate high risk. A cautious approach is advised to balance potential gains against significant downside risks.

Technical Analysis

Trend Direction: Medium-term (1-3 months) uptrend Support/Resistance Levels:

  • SMA 20: $2.93 (resistance)
  • Middle Bollinger Band: $2.93 (support)
  • Upper Bollinger Band: $3.48 (resistance)

Momentum Signals:

  • RSI interpretation: Neutral (62.15)
  • MACD signal: Bullish momentum
  • Bollinger Bands position: Overbought

Volume Analysis:

  • Volume SMA 20: 2194174.05 (increasing)
  • On-Balance Volume (OBV): 381492889.00 (positive)
  • Volume Rate of Change: 2388.67% (high)

News & Sentiment Analysis

Recent Headlines Summary: Neutral/Positive (mostly news headlines with no significant market-moving events)

Sentiment Assessment: Neutral (aggregate sentiment)

Catalyst Identification: Merger agreement announced on March 12, potential for further growth and consolidation

Market Narrative: News sentiment is mostly neutral, but the merger announcement could bring positive catalysts.

Risk & Volatility Assessment

Beta Interpretation: N/A (no data available) Volatility Regime: High volatility Options Market Signals: No options data available Downside Protection: Support levels and risk management considerations: SMA 20 ($2.93) and Middle Bollinger Band ($2.93)

Market Context & Positioning

Sector Performance: Information Technology sector has been performing well, with MINM following a similar trend. Institutional Activity: Moderate institutional interest, but no significant buying or selling pressure evident. Correlation Analysis: N/A (no data available) Relative Valuation: Position within trading range, potentially oversold

Key Levels & Action Items

Critical Price Levels:

  • SMA 20: $2.93
  • Middle Bollinger Band: $2.93

Breakout/Breakdown Levels: None evident at this time.

Time-Sensitive Catalysts: Merger agreement announcement on March 12, potentially bringing positive catalysts.

Risk Management: Stop-loss levels and position sizing considerations:

  • SMA 20 ($2.93) as a potential stop-loss level
  • Position size: 50% to 75% of total portfolio (depending on individual risk tolerance)

Please let me know if you would like me to modify or elaborate on any part of this report!

Generated

MINM Options Activity & IV Rank

Loading options activity...
Spread Scanner GPU
Full Algorithm Docs ↗

Each spread is ranked by a composite score built in three stages. Full documentation →

Stage 1 — Base Score (GPU scanner)

score = P(profit) × (credit / spread_width)
P(profit) from short leg delta (1 − |delta|), penalised above 85%. Credit uses mid-price to handle illiquid chains fairly.

Stage 2 — Skew Adjustment (±25% cap)

RR and BF (30-delta) from the persisted per-symbol skew snapshot — wing strikes picked by real greeks.delta, not a moneyness proxy. Put skew boosts bull puts, penalises bear calls. High butterfly boosts iron condors. Calendars are skew-neutral.

Stage 3 — Technical Overlay (±50% cap, 5 groups)
Group 1 · Directional Bias (±0.25)
  • RSI <40 bullish / >60 bearish
  • MACD crossover + histogram trend
  • Price vs SMA 50 & SMA 200
Group 2 · Momentum (±0.10)
  • Stochastic %K <20 / >80
  • Williams %R <−80 / >−20
Group 3 · Volatility (up to −0.25 / +0.15)
  • Blended ATR + straddle expected-move penalty
  • Bollinger Band signal (+ counter-trend penalty)
  • BB width — vol contraction boost for ICs
Group 4 · IV Regime (±0.15)
  • IV rank ≥ 75 → strong boost for credit spreads
  • IV rank < 25 → penalty (selling cheap vol)
Group 5 · Liquidity (penalty up to −0.10)
  • Min open interest across all legs
  • OI < 100 → −0.10 · OI < 500 → −0.05

score = base_score × skew_multiplier × tech_multiplier
Both multipliers are shown per spread. Beta is informational only — ATR already captures realized vol. Full algorithm documentation →

Enter a ticker to scan for optimal spread opportunities.

Evaluates all bull put, bear call, iron condor, and calendar spread combinations using GPU-accelerated analysis.

Skew (Wing IV − ATM IV)
DTE:
Wing Δ:
Metric:
Wing vs ATM
IV(put wing) − IV(ATM), in vol points

How much the OTM put trades above (or below) the at-the-money strike. Measures the height of the put-side tail relative to ATM — i.e. how expensive crash insurance is on this name.

  • Positive (typical) — wing IV > ATM IV. Standard equity put skew: portfolios bid up crash protection, so OTM puts trade richer than ATM.
  • Near zero or negative (unusual) — wing IV ≤ ATM IV. Flat or inverted put side. Common when there's no fear demand, in tightly mean-reverting names, or right after an earnings catalyst clears.
  • Percentile vs own 3-yr history: high = wings rich (good time to sell wing premium); low = wings cheap (good time to buy protection).
  • Not directional — high or low wings don't predict up or down moves. It's a price tag on tail insurance, not a forecast.
Risk Reversal
IV(call wing) − IV(put wing), equal delta on each side

Which side of the smile is the market paying up for? Measures the tilt of the surface — call skew vs put skew at matched deltas.

  • Negative (typical) — puts richer than calls. Standard equity behavior: hedging demand makes puts carry a premium. Most large-caps sit in the −1 to −5 vol-point range.
  • Strongly negative (< −5 pts) — heavy downside hedging, elevated fear, or an upcoming catalyst (earnings, FDA, macro event). Worth flagging.
  • Positive — calls richer than puts. Unusual for equities; signals bullish momentum, short-squeeze positioning, or takeover/M&A speculation.
  • Near zero — symmetric surface. Market sees roughly equal up/down risk. Rare for large-caps; more common in commodities and FX.
Reading them together

Wing-vs-ATM tells you how expensive the tails are. Risk Reversal tells you which side is favored. Combined:

  • High wing percentile + deeply negative RR → strong put bid; stress or major event priced in. Owning protection costs a premium; selling put premium is dangerous.
  • Low wing percentile + near-zero RR → complacency; insurance cheap and balanced. Good environment to add cheap downside hedges.
  • Positive RR + elevated wings → call-side fear-of-missing-out; common in squeeze setups. Upside calls expensive, downside puts not bid.
14 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —
30 DTE / 10d —
— pts EXTREME
ATM — / Wing —

Percentile is the rank of today's reading within ~3 years of this symbol's own history. High percentile = wings are rich relative to history; not a directional signal. Skew is read off the chain in real time, not from CBOE SKEW.

Volatility Surface

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility surface.

Volatility Smile

Enter a ticker to render the implied volatility smile.

IV Rank (7 DTE)
IV Rank (30 DTE)
Straddle Price (30 DTE)
Beta Analysis
Insufficient price history — listed 6230 days ago. Beta and correlation vs SPY require ~1 year of daily returns to be statistically meaningful.

MINM Institutional Ownership (13F)

Institutional managers with $100M+ AUM file Form 13F-HR quarterly, due 45 days after quarter end. Holdings are reported gross at quarter-end market value — they are a snapshot, not a real-time position.

  • Shares — long equity positions in this name, aggregated across share classes.
  • Calls / Puts — notional value of long call / put exposure where this ticker is the underlying.
  • % of Float — holder's reported shares divided by the latest diluted shares outstanding. Sums above 100% indicate large custodian / prime broker positions where the same shares are reported by multiple filers.
  • Custodian badge — filers with more than 5,000 holdings are typically broker-dealers / custodians reporting customer-held shares, not active managers.

Each filer is counted once at its latest 13F-HR filing. New filings are ingested on a weekly cadence.

# Filer Shares Value % of Total % of Float Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period
# Filer Notional Value % of Total Period

MINM Insider Trading (Form 4)

Latest: 2025-05-13
Form 4 filings — insider beneficial-ownership changes by officers, directors, and 10%+ holders. Filed within 2 business days of transaction.
Filed Reporter Role Action Shares Avg Price Net $ Link
2025-05-13 Cao Yu Chief Financial Officer Buy (P) +1,585,366 $1.64 $2.60M EDGAR
2025-05-13 Hu Bin Director Buy (P) +853,659 $1.64 $1.40M EDGAR
2025-04-14 Li Wai Chung Chief Executive Officer Buy (P) +3,411 RSU — EDGAR
2025-04-14 Cao Yu Chief Financial Officer Buy (P) +15,913 RSU — EDGAR
2025-04-14 Hu Bin 10%+ Owner Buy (P) +11,934 RSU — EDGAR
2025-03-10 David E. Lazar Director Award (A) +1,200,000 — EDGAR
2025-01-15 Elizabeth Cash Hitchcock 10%+ Owner Sell (S) −1,447,259 $0.03 -$49.6K EDGAR
2025-01-15 Jeremy P. Hitchcock 10%+ Owner Sell (S) −1,447,259 $0.03 -$49.6K EDGAR
2024-12-31 David E. Lazar Director Buy (P) +1,456,980 $0.03 $50.0K EDGAR
2024-10-22 David E. Lazar Director Award (A) — — EDGAR
2024-10-09 Patrick William Rivard Director Award (A) +88,042 — EDGAR
2024-10-08 Andrew F. Papanicolau Director Award (A) +74,917 — EDGAR
2024-10-01 Matthew Charles McMurdo Director Award (A) +159,364 — EDGAR
2024-10-01 David Natan Director Award (A) +121,792 — EDGAR
2024-10-01 Avraham Ben-Tzvi Director Award (A) +159,364 — EDGAR
Codes: P = open-market purchase · S = open-market sale · A = grant/award · M = option exercise · F = tax withholding at vest · G = bona-fide gift · D = disposition to issuer · J = other (described in filing footnote — typically 401(k), trust, inheritance) · W = will/inheritance. Only P / S codes carry directional signal.

MINM Insider Holdings

3 insiders · @ $3.61
Officers, directors, and 10%+ owners who have filed a Form 4 in the past two years, ranked by current disclosed exposure (shares × today's price). Shares are direct + indirect (via trusts / LLCs / spouse). Excludes unvested RSU and option grants — those aren't beneficially owned until vest.
# Insider Role Shares Disclosed Exposure Lifetime OM Net Filings Last Filed
1 David E. Lazar Director 2,681,980 $9.68M $50.0K 5 2025-03-10
2 Cao Yu Chief Financial Officer 1,585,366 $5.72M $2.60M 2 2025-05-13
3 Hu Bin Director 853,659 $3.08M $1.40M 2 2025-05-13
Lifetime OM Net = signed sum of open-market buys (P) and sells (S) over their career; excludes grants, tax withholdings, and dispositions to issuer. A large negative number is normal for long-tenured executives — they've sold compensation grants over many years.

MINM Board & Officers

As of SEC filings through Oct 5, 2026

Directors 6

Officers 2

  • Li Wai Chung · Chief Executive Officer · since Feb 18, 2025
  • Cao Yu · Chief Financial Officer · since Feb 18, 2025

10% owners 4

Changes in the last 10 years (89)
Sep 30, 2026Angel Colon became a director
Jan 14, 2026Hongya Wen became a director
Oct 27, 2025Man Ching Wong became a 10% owner
Oct 27, 2025Elements Corporate Services Ltd became a 10% owner
Jun 23, 2025The company announced the departure of David E. Lazar from the board in an SEC filing
May 13, 2025Hu Bin first listed as a director in an SEC filing
May 13, 2025Cao Yu first listed as a director in an SEC filing
Apr 30, 2025Oi Fat Chan became a director
Feb 18, 2025The company announced the departure of Patrick William Rivard from the board in an SEC filing
Feb 18, 2025The company announced the departure of Matthew Charles McMurdo from the board in an SEC filing
Feb 18, 2025The company announced the departure of Avraham Ben-Tzvi from the board in an SEC filing
Feb 18, 2025The company announced the departure of Andrew F. Papanicolau from the board in an SEC filing
Feb 18, 2025Li Wai Chung became a 10% owner
Feb 18, 2025Li Wai Chung became Chief Executive Officer
Feb 18, 2025Hu Bin became a 10% owner
Feb 18, 2025Cao Yu became a 10% owner
Feb 18, 2025Cao Yu became Chief Financial Officer
Dec 26, 2024Jeremy P. Hitchcock left the board, per their own SEC filing
Dec 26, 2024Jeremy P. Hitchcock left as Executive Chairman, per their own SEC filing
Dec 26, 2024Jeremy P. Hitchcock is no longer a 10% owner, per their own SEC filing
Not reported recently (18)
Compiled from SEC filings by the company and its directors and officers. Dates are as stated in those filings. Where no filing says when someone left, we show the last filing that listed them.
ETF Holders
# ETF Provider Weight $ Exposure ETF AUM As Of
Fundamentals

Quarterly filings sourced from SEC 10-Q / 10-K reports. TTM tiles aggregate the most recent four quarters; bars show the last ~12 quarters oldest → newest.

Metrics
  • Revenue — top-line sales. Look for consistent YoY growth; seasonal businesses need same-quarter comparisons (Q4 '24 vs Q4 '23).
  • Net Income — bottom-line profit after all expenses. Can be volatile from one-time items; red bars = net loss.
  • Diluted EPS — net income per share assuming options/converts are exercised. Direct input to the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Cash Flow — cash generated from core operations, before capex and financing. Harder to manipulate than net income; growing OCF is a quality signal.
How to read the bars
  • Sequential growth — quarter-over-quarter trend. Accelerating bars are a momentum signal.
  • YoY growth — compare to the same quarter a year earlier to remove seasonality.
  • Quality — OCF should roughly track Net Income over time. Large divergence (net income ≫ OCF) flags accruals risk.
  • Margins — scan the bar ratios: Net Income / Revenue tells you margin trend without needing a separate chart.

TTM (trailing-twelve-month) smooths seasonality and is used for the P/E calculation. Filings appear 30–90 days after the period closes.